Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0724-01388
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 08/19/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 08/19/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/26/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/26/2024 4:22:20 PM 1. General: No structural plans were provided for review. Provide detailed structural plans. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/26/2024 4:21:47 PM 1. NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify code violations. Any oversight by the reviewer shall not be considered as authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The designer is responsible for following all applicable federal, state, and municipal codes and ordinances. 2. General: A detailed code analysis has not been provided. Provide a Building Code Analysis on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: ◦ Occupancy Classification(s) ◦ For Mixed Occupancy Buildings, state whether the “non-separated” or “separated” option was chosen from Sections 508.3 / 508.4. ◦ Description of Use ◦ Type of Construction ◦ Sprinklers: ◦ Existing, allowable, and actual stories ◦ Existing, allowable, and actual height ◦ Existing, allowable, and actual floor area ◦ Existing and new occupant load calculations ◦ Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 503 (if applicable) ◦ Justification to exceed allowable height or stories in Table 503 (if applicable) 3. General: The architectural site plan is missing a significant amount of information. Provide an architectural site that contains the following: ◦ Prepared to an approved architectural or engineering scale. ◦ Show the property boundary lines. ◦ Placement of the proposed building or structure within the property. ◦ Indicate the location of required setback requirements. ◦ Placement of all existing buildings or structures on the property, with an assumed or imaginary property line between structures to establish fire separation distances and fire resistance rating requirements within the adopted edition of the International Building Code. ◦ The Accessible Route/Exit Discharge Plan or information is provided to show the running slopes and cross slopes for verification of compliance with the 2009 A117.1. 4. General: Demolition and existing plans have been provided, however, no proposed floor plans have been provided. Provide detailed proposed floor plans. 5. General: There is a substantial amount of information missing from the plans regarding the scope of work. Provide a detailed scope of work and provide a cohesive set of plans that clearly delineate the work that is being completed. Further reviews will be necessary. 6. General: No window schedule has been provided. Provide a detailed window schedule. 7. General: No door schedule has been provided. Provide a door window schedule. 8. General: The plans indicate a phased demo and renovation. Provide detailed egress plans during the phased onstruction and finished project. 9. RESUBMITTAL DIRECTIONS: ◦ All corrections must be clouded, delta numbered, with a brief explanation within the plan sheet or the title block of the sheet. For corrections or revision to whole plan sheets, you need only cloud the sheet number and provide the delta identification number, with a brief explanation of the change(s). ◦ As part of the resubmittal, please collate all revised sheets into the electronic document (PDF) and submit a complete and full plan set. We cannot accept individual sheets in response to review comments, since the entire plan set is required for approval and permitting. ◦ Please include with the resubmittal a separate response narrative, which is numbered or itemized to correspond to each of the noted plan review comments items. ◦ This response narrative must clearly address how each issue was corrected or resolved and indicate where the information may be found within the construction documents. The response narrative must be typewritten, on letterhead noting the project name, with the Permit Application Number. Failure to provide this response narrative may result in review delays or rejection of the resubmittal. ◦ Once all electronic construction documents (plan sheets, energy compliance certificates, reports, calculations, etc.) have been revised according to the above directions. Please resubmit the complete revised plan set with a separate copy of response narrative PDF through the municipality to complete the review. ◦ Review of revised construction documents in response to this letter may take upwards of 5 (five) business days, depending on the size of the project and the volume of plans in queue at time of resubmittal. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/26/2024 4:21:59 PM 1. General: No mechanical plans were provided for review. Provide detailed mechanical plans. Electrical(E) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/26/2024 4:21:54 PM 1. General: No electrical plans were provided for review. Provide detailed electrical plans. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/26/2024 4:22:13 PM 1. General: No plumbing plans were provided for review. Provide detailed plumbing plans. |
||
| 08/19/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resolve all building comments john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 08/16/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0724-01388 749 W MIRACLE MILE - C-2 Renovation – Proposed Use Unknown ( Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 16, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Use is unknown. 1. Provide a use as defined in the Unified Development Code (UDC). 2. The site plan lot layout is not correct. So the correct lot lines on the site plan or remove the site plan. The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/18/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |