Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0723-01844
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/09/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/25/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 9/21/2023 7:30:07 PM No Structural Review is required for proposed scope. If scope is modified to include demolition of existing structural members, addition of window or door openings or addition of new site structures (solid awnings, pergolas, etc), please resubmit for review. Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/18/2023 10:28:52 AM 1. General: No egress plans have been provided. Provide detailed egress plans. 2. General: If any demolition work is being completed, provide detailed demolition plans. 3. General: No scope of work has been provided. Provide a detailed scope of work of all that is being completed. 4. General: The City of Tucson adopts and amends the 2018 edition of the codes. Please reference and demonstrate compliance with those codes adopted and amended by the City of Tucson. Revise to reflect the adopted codes. 5. General: The IEBC is recommended when an existing building is undergoing a change of occupancy. One is free to use either the IEBC or the IBC, but not both, unless specifically referenced by the IEBC. If the IEBC is the desired approach, one must choose 1 of 4 compliance paths. These compliance paths cannot be used in combination with each other in accordance Section 301.3 of the IEBC. It is important to note that the Chapter 3 requirements apply to all compliance methods. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements but is also the most conservative approach. i. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements but is also the most conservative approach. ii. Work area compliance method: Chapters 6-12: The work area compliance method provides the greatest number of benefits to the building owner and design professional. This is the easiest route to take. It is much more conservative. iii. Performance compliance method: Chapter 13: This method focuses on what the building is required to do, rather than prescribing how it is to be constructed. This method requires the design profession to work more closely with the owner of the building, as well as the code official, to ensure that design meets specific requirements for the occupants and not simply the prescriptive requirements. iv. Previously adopted code: Section 301.3 Exception 1. This method utilizes a previously adopted code under which the area in question was most recently built or modified; this requires the code official’s approval. ◦ Please clearly indicate which compliance method has been chosen and provide a narrative outlining the applicable code requirements. 6. Sheet A-1: The plans indicate that the construction documents are not for construction. Provide plans that are not preliminary and are issued for construction. 7. Sheet A-1: A minimum number of dwelling units are required to have mobility features. Provide a room matrix that shows that accessible room calculations. Additionally, ensure that rooms are properly dispersed throughout the structure. Section 233 of the 2010 ADAAG and 1107.6.2.2.1 of the IBC. 8. Sheet A-1: It is unclear of the total areas of each building. Clearly provide the area of each building. 9. Sheet A-1: The construction type is unclear. It is indicated as Type V-B in one location and Type IV in another. Provide clarity on the correct construction type. Type VB will be assumed for the remaining of the review. 10. Sheet A-1: The occupant load is incomplete. Provide a complete space by space building by building occupant load calculation in accordance with Section 1004.3. 11. Sheet A-2.1: Provide clarification as to the use of the employee only rooms. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/21/2023 12:26:40 PM Provide minimum Design Criteria. No Mechanical Plans submitted. 2018 IBC Chapter 28 and 2018 IMC Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/13/2023 12:50:09 PM Electrical Review By: Ron Ross PE No electrical submitted for review. Electrical is denied. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/23/2023 6:31:48 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Need to address Building plan review comments, 2,3,4,7,8,9,10 -IPC 106.3.1 2). plan submittal needs to include plumbing plans -IPC 106.3.1 3). Plans need to include laundry facility configurations to show enough new or existing washer connections to comply with the amount of living units -IPC 403.1 4). plans need to include fixture spacing measurements -IPC 405.3.1 |
||
| 10/05/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Title block states these will be apartments and hotel. Will this be a mixed use or are some buildings R1 and some buildings R2? Indicate the number of units per building that will be apartments or hotel rooms. -Depending on occupancy type and number of units, a fire alarm may be required per IFC 907.2.8 and/or 907.2.9. Indicate if a fire alarm will be installed. -Clarify if fire sprinklers are existing or if they will be installed. I do not show any records of those buildings being sprinklered. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 09/22/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview 1. There are new proposed buildings on the site. Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use and building structure additions. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06 must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this building plan. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans and is submitted in the TDC Online Portal. |
||
| 09/11/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: TC-COM-0723-01844 314 East Benson Highway – C-2/R-2 Multifamily Development (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 11, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings with a detailed response letter stating how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. As you are proposing a change of use from Travelers’ Accommodation, Lodging, to Multifamily Development, a development package in accordance with Administrative Manual Section 2-06.0.0 is required. The associated development package shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to zoning approval of TC-COM-0723-01844. The development package is a separate submittal and shall be applied for through the Tucson Development Center Online under application type “Development Package.” If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. |
||
| 10/09/2023 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show the locations of the reduced pressure backflow assembly and water meter on the drawings; indicate the size of the assembly and meter. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/tucson-water/water-quality/documents/backflow-ordinance.pdf. | ||
| 09/08/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |