Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.5
Permit Number - TC-COM-0723-01844
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.5
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/05/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 9/21/2023 7:30:07 PM No Structural Review is required for proposed scope. If scope is modified to include demolition of existing structural members, addition of window or door openings or addition of new site structures (solid awnings, pergolas, etc), please resubmit for review. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/3/2024 10:35:39 AM 1. RESOLVED General: No egress plans have been provided. Provide detailed egress plans. 2. UNRESOLVED General: If any demolition work is being completed, provide detailed demolition plans. 3. UNRESOLVED General: No scope of work has been provided. Provide a detailed scope of work of all that is being completed. 4. RESOLVED General: The City of Tucson adopts and amends the 2018 edition of the codes. Please reference and demonstrate compliance with those codes adopted and amended by the City of Tucson. Revise to reflect the adopted codes. 5. UNRESOLVED General: The IEBC is recommended when an existing building is undergoing a change of occupancy. One is free to use either the IEBC or the IBC, but not both, unless specifically referenced by the IEBC. If the IEBC is the desired approach, one must choose 1 of 4 compliance paths. These compliance paths cannot be used in combination with each other in accordance Section 301.3 of the IEBC. It is important to note that the Chapter 3 requirements apply to all compliance methods. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements but is also the most conservative approach. i. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements but is also the most conservative approach. ii. Work area compliance method: Chapters 6-12: The work area compliance method provides the greatest number of benefits to the building owner and design professional. This is the easiest route to take. It is much more conservative. iii. Performance compliance method: Chapter 13: This method focuses on what the building is required to do, rather than prescribing how it is to be constructed. This method requires the design profession to work more closely with the owner of the building, as well as the code official, to ensure that design meets specific requirements for the occupants and not simply the prescriptive requirements. iv. Previously adopted code: Section 301.3 Exception 1. This method utilizes a previously adopted code under which the area in question was most recently built or modified; this requires the code official’s approval. ◦ Please clearly indicate which compliance method has been chosen and provide a narrative outlining the applicable code requirements. 6. RESOLVED Sheet A-1: The plans indicate that the construction documents are not for construction. Provide plans that are not preliminary and are issued for construction. 7. RESOLVED Sheet A-1: A minimum number of dwelling units are required to have mobility features. Provide a room matrix that shows that accessible room calculations. Additionally, ensure that rooms are properly dispersed throughout the structure. Section 233 of the 2010 ADAAG and 1107.6.2.2.1 of the IBC. 8. RESOLVED Sheet A-1: It is unclear of the total areas of each building. Clearly provide the area of each building. 9. UNRESOLVED Sheet A-1: The construction type is unclear. It is indicated as Type V-B in one location and Type IV in another. Provide clarity on the correct construction type. Type VB will be assumed for the remaining of the review.◦ NOTE: The newly provided construction type of Type III-R-1 is not a recognized construction type. Provide a recognized and actual construction type in accordance with 2018 IBC Table 601. 10. RESOLVED Sheet A-1: The occupant load is incomplete. Provide a complete space by space building by building occupant load calculation in accordance with Section 1004.3. 11. RESOLVED Sheet A-2.1: Provide clarification as to the use of the employee only rooms. 12. General: The construction documents have not been stamped by a registered design professional. Provide a set construction documents that stamped by a registered design professional. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/3/2024 2:56:01 PM 1. (UNRESOLVED) - General - Provide minimum Design Criteria. No Mechanical Plans submitted. 2018 IBC Chapter 28 and 2018 IMC i. No Mechanical Plans submitted. 2018 IBC Chapter 28 Section 2801.1 and 2018 IMC ii. Provide Mechanical Scope. Mechanical Scope includes but not limited to all and any Mechanical work (new work, existing to be replaced, existing to be relocated as required by the 2018 IMC, IBC, IECC. - 2018 IBC Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. 2018 IEBC Section [A]106.2.1 Construction Documents - 2018 IEBC Section 1008.1 Mechanical Requirements iii. Provide Energy Heat Load Calculations - 2018 IECC Section C403.1.1 Calculation of heating and cooling loads iv. Provide Ventilation Calculation/Schedule for all occupied and common spaces. 2018 IMC Table 403.3.1.1 - ASHRAE 62.1 & 90.1 v. Show Mechanical exhaust for all bathrooms and storage areas as required by the 2018 IMC, IBC, IECC. - 2018 IBC Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. vi. Show all O/A duct and O/A CFM quantities to all common areas. - 2018 IMC Section 403 Mechanical Ventilation Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 6/3/2024 7:23:48 AM 1. E-1.0: Extra duplicate sheet in electrical submittal set. 2. There are two different E-6.0 sheets. The second E-6.0 sheet should be renumbered to E-6.1. 3. On the second E-6.0 sheet, should rebalance loads on Panels P, 2E1, and 1G2 as they are very poorly balanced and may nuisance trip their overload protection. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/4/2024 8:21:22 PM Second Plumbing Review: Comments 1,5,6,7, 8 remain Unresolved-1). Need to address Building plan review comments, 2,3,4,7,8,9,10 -IPC 106.3.1 Resolved-2). plan submittal needs to include plumbing plans -IPC 106.3.1 Resolved-3). Plans need to include laundry facility configurations to show enough new or existing washer connections to comply with the amount of living units -IPC 403.1 Resolved-4). plans need to include fixture spacing measurements -IPC 405.3.1 5). General: Now that the plans have included plumbing plans & existing laundry layout there is not enough washing machine stations for the amount of living units. Update the plans with enough washing machine stations in along with required plumbing illustrations accordance with -2018 IPC 403.1 & 106.3.1 6). Plan page P-3.0: Fixture schedule needs to include the manufacturer name & model number of the kitchen sink & faucet. Add the Fixture specs to the fixture schedule in accordance with -2018 IPC section 303 7). General: Newly added plumbing plans need to show the required employee/office restroom(s). Update plan set with the existing or employee rest room location. Update all affected plan pages accordingly. -2018 IPC 106.3.1, 403.3 8). Plan page 3.0: New Plan page missing the existing building drain size to see if it will accommodate the new load. Update the plan page with the existing & required building drain size info in accordance with -2018 IPC 710.1 |
||
| 07/09/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -This is a change of occupancy classification from R1 to R2. Fire sprinklers are required for R2 occupancies per the IBC 903.2.8 and IEBC 1011.2. -Change of occupancy classification also requires a building fire alarm per IBC 907.2.9 and IEBC 1011.2.2. Hard wired smoke detectors are not considered a building fire alarm. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 06/25/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment | ||
| 06/19/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD: Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0723-01844 314 East Benson Highway – C-2/R-2 Multifamily Development (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 19, 2024 This comment was not addressed. The comment response sheet does not address how the comment was addressed. Resubmit revised drawings with a detailed response letter stating how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. This comment was not addressed. As you are proposing a change of use from Travelers’ Accommodation, Lodging, to Multifamily Development, a development package in accordance with Administrative Manual Section 2-06.0.0 is required. The associated development package shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to zoning approval of TC-COM-0723-01844. The development package is a separate submittal and shall be applied for through the Tucson Development Center Online under application type “Development Package.” If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/27/2024 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show the locations of the reduced pressure backflow assembly and water meter on the drawings; indicate the size of the assembly and meter. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/tucson-water/water-quality/documents/backflow-ordinance.pdf.] | ||
| 05/30/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |