Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Permit Number - TC-COM-0626-00973
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14/2026 | Commercial Electrical Standard | APPROVED | Electrical (E) Reviewer Jake Doub; jdoub@safebuilt.com Discipline Status:Approved As Is Date Completed: 10/14/2026 |
||
| 10/14/2026 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | APPROVED | Mechanical (M) Reviewer Jorge Valido; jvalido@safebuilt.com Discipline Status:Approved As Is Date Completed: 10/12/2026 |
||
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | IN REVIEW | |||
| N/A | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Design Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/14/2026 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Building (B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis; abevis@safebuilt.com Discipline Status:Approved As Is Date Completed: 10/7/2026 Structural (S) Reviewer Nicholas Jno-Baptiste; njnobaptiste@safebuilt.com Discipline Status:Denied Date Completed: 10/12/2026 1.A1.21 (Site Details) / Information Required.Detail 1 shows a 12" SQ. base plate for the Site Lighting at Grade. Provide the thickness for the base plate.(RESOLVED) 2.S1.0 (General Structural Notes) / Information Required.Provide components and cladding diagrams and design wind pressures table applicable to structure for roof and wall surfaces per ASCE 7-16/22 Chapter 30.(RESOLVED) 3.S1.0 (General Structural Notes) / Clarification.The ASCE Hazard Tool (https://ascehazardtool.org/ list Seismic Design Category C for the project location. Update or provide basis for using Seismic Design Category B.(RESOLVED) 4.S1.4 (Typical Details) / Clarification.Reorient Detail 30 to display all the notes.(RESOLVED) 5.S1.5 (Typical Details) / Information Required.Detail 42 does not provide a detail number for the C8.11.5 beam connections in Notes 3 and 4. Provide the detail number for these references.(UNRESOLVED) ◦The requested information has not been provided. 6.S2.2 (Level 0.5 Column and Shearwall Plan) / Clarification.Note 3 refers to Typical Column Cross Section as Detail C1/S1.6. Clarify if this should not be Detail CC1/S1.6. This comment applies to other sheets as well.(UNRESOLVED) ◦The keynote refers to CCX/S1.6, but the SCHEDULES Sheet is S1.09. 7.S2.4 (Level 2 Elevated Concrete Podium Plan) / Confirmation.Confirm the LTX/BX labels/callouts are for existing beams/lintels.(RESOLVED) 8.S2.8 (Level 2.5 Wall Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan calls out SW5 and SW6 which have not been provided in the Shearwall Schedule. Revise plan and/or schedule to provide accurate shearwall callout.(RESOLVED) 9.S2.8 (Level 2.5 Wall Framing Plan) / Clarification.The shearwall near Grid 8 has two (2) callouts. Revise plan to depict one callout for the shearwall in this location.(RESOLVED) 10.S2.8 (Level 2.5 Wall Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan cuts Section 222 at the elevator which does not appear to be the correct detail. Confirm if this is the correct detail at the elevator slab opening. This comment applies to other sheets as well.(RESOLVED) 11.S2.8 (Level 2.5 Wall Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan calls out Wall Framing Keynotes 6 and 7 on but does not list them. Provide these keynotes.(RESOLVED) 12.S2.8 (Level 2.5 Wall Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan calls out Detail 204 at the CMU between the elevator openings which does not appear to be the correct detail. Confirm if this is the correct detail between the elevator openings. This comment applies to other sheets as well.(UNRESOLVED) ◦This section is still cut on sheets S2.09, S2.10, S2.11. Clarify if detail applies at the opening. 13.S2.9 (Level 3 Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan calls out SW3 which have not been provided in the Shearwall Schedule. Revise plan and or schedule to provide accurate shearwall callout.(RESOLVED) 14.S2.10 (Level 4 Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan calls out SW4 which have not been provided in the Shearwall Schedule. Revise plan and or schedule to provide accurate shearwall callout.(RESOLVED) 15.S2.10 (Level 4 Framing Plan) / Clarification.The plan calls out B4 which have not been provided in the Beam Schedule. Revise plan and or schedule to provide accurate beam callout.(UNRESOLVED) ◦Callout B4 does not appear to be required at this location. Clarify if a steel beam is required to frame out the chase. 16.S2.13 (Roof Framing Plan) / Clarification.Plan Note 7 does not appear to be called out at the correct location on the Roof Framing plan. Revise plan and or note.(UNRESOLVED) ◦The note is still called out at the location. Clarify if an elevator hoist beam is required along the perimeter of the building. 17.S2.13 (Roof Framing Plan) & S5.0 (Roof Framing Details) / Clarification.The High Elevator Roof Framing Plan depicts wide flange beams framing to an HSS divider beam, Section 303 is labeled as such but the detail depicts HSS to HSS connections. Revise plan and or note.(UNRESOLVED) ◦The detail has been updated, however, the section view still depicts an hss beam framing to an hss beam. 18.S6.0 (Stair Plans) / Information Required.The stair plans do not have detail callouts. Provide callouts that match the plan sheets.(UNRESOLVED) ◦Provide callouts for the details. I.E. 1/S6.00, 2/S6.00, etc. |
||
| 10/13/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TC-COM-0626-00973 (3rd Review) Project: NEW GROUND UP HOTEL; 6 STORY BUILDING Location: 45 N 5TH AV Review Date: 10/13/2026 Reviewer: John Mounsey – Engineering Associate Reviewer Contact Information: john.mounsey@tucsonaz.gov Site Engineering Comments: 1. Site Engineering has completed its review of the submitted plan set and cross-referenced it against the associated development package. However, Site Engineering is unable to grant final approval for Commercial Permit: TC-COM-0626-00973 until the associated revision to Development Package TD-DEV-0626-00166 has received full approval and has been issued. Please resubmit for final approval once the development package has been approved and issued by all applicable reviewers. For final approval - Ensure that all building plans match what is shown in the development package plan set. |
||
| 10/01/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |