Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - LIMITED v.3
Permit Number - TC-COM-0625-01183
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - LIMITED v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/18/2025 | Commercial Building | APPROVED | |||
| 11/04/2025 | Commercial Electrical | APPROVED | |||
| 11/04/2025 | Outdoor Lighting | APPROVED | |||
| 11/18/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/18/2025 | Commercial Mechanical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Correct the insulation requirements for the stud walls on sheet A1.0. [Second comment: The wall insulation requirements on sheet A1.0 are incorrect. The minimum requirements for wood-framed walls in Climate Zone 2 are R13 +3.6 ci or R20. The exterior wall section you show on delta 1 of sheet A2.0, however, is acceptable based on Table C402.1.3, IECC 2018.] [Initial comment: Specify the required maximum U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) for the doors on the architectural drawings. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2018.] | ||
| 11/18/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | No secondary scupper provided.[Second comment: “Secondary roof drain systems shall have the end point of discharge separate from the primary system.” The secondary (overflow) scupper therefore cannot be located above the primary scupper. In addition, the secondary scupper is typically located only 2inches above the primary scupper unless the roof structure is designed for the additional water weight. Note: a single 8” x 4” primary scupper with an 8” x 4” secondary scupper can easily accommodate the storm drainage for the 200 square foot building (see Table 1106.2, IPC 2018). [Initial comment: Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1108.1, 1108.2 and 1108.3, IPC 2018.] | ||
| 11/13/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TC-COM-0625-01183 Location: 750 E FOOTHILLS DR Review Date: 11/13/2025 Site Engineering Comments: 1. The proposed ADU type office for this commercial property requires the submission of a Development Package. Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c, a site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A Development Package (DP) meeting the requirements of the Checklist for Minor Changes to Commercial/Industrial Sites is required to be submitted and approved. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans. The checklist can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/minor_changes_to_commercial_industrial_sites_.pdf. 2. Site Engineering is unable to review and approve permit TC-COM-0625-01183 until the associated Development Package is reviewed and approved by all reviewers. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/13/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Section Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0625-01183 750 E. Foothills Dr. Tucson, AZ 85718 Adding an ADU type office suite in the backyard (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/13/2025 This site is located in the C-1 zone (UDC 4.7.20). Residential Care Services is a permitted use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.J.3.d, .4, & .8 and 4.9.13.O Comments: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: Previous comment 1 not addressed. If you feel a Development Package is not required, please include an email from the director stating a DP is not required on your next submittal. Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c, a site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A Development Package (DP) meeting the minimum requirements is required to be submitted and approved. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans. The checklist can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/submittal_requirements.pdf. Site zoning is unable to approve this building permit until the DP has been approved by all reviewers. 2. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming depending on responses to zoning review comments and plans submitted. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 11/04/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |