Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0624-01147
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/09/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 10/14/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/18/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 9/17/2024 5:31:34 PM Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/22/2024 10:31:41 PM New Review - Revision Narrative Dated 8/23/2024 1. Plan Sheet M1.0 – OVERALL MAIN FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - Identify/Tag all equipment referenced in the changes Plan Sheet M1.0. - 2018 IECC Section C103.2Information on construction documents - 2018 IBC – Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. NPR Resubmittal Directions. ◦ RESUBMITTAL DIRECTIONS: ◦ All corrections must be clouded, delta numbered, with a brief explanation within the plan sheet or the title block of the sheet. For corrections or revision to whole plan sheets, you need only cloud the sheet number and provide the delta identification number, with a brief explanation of the change(s). ◦ As part of the resubmittal, please collate all revised sheets into the electronic document (PDF) and submit a complete and full plan set. We cannot accept individual sheets in response to review comments, since the entire plan set is required for approval and permitting. ◦ Please include with the resubmittal a separate response narrative, which is numbered or itemized to correspond to each of the noted plan review comments items. ◦ This response narrative must clearly address how each issue was corrected or resolved and indicate where the information may be found within the construction documents. The response narrative must be typewritten, on a letterhead noting the project name, with the Permit Application Number. Failure to provide this response narrative may result in review delays or rejection of the resubmittal. ◦ Once all electronic construction documents (plan sheets, energy compliance certificates, reports, calculations, etc.) have been revised according to the above directions. Please resubmit the complete revised plan set with a separate copy of response narrative PDF through the municipality to complete the review. ◦ Review of revised construction documents in response to this letter may take upwards of 5 (five) business days, depending on the size of the project and the volume of plans in queue at time of resubmittal. Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 9/16/2024 5:01:07 PM Plumbing(P) Reviewer (from previous submittal TUC9570001.091224) Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/17/2024 11:05:38 PM Un-resolved-3). Plan page P1.1: The primary & secondary roof drain locations & quantity don't correlate with locations & quantity shown on plan page P2.0. Update Plan page P1.1 to correlate with all the roof drains shown on P2.0. -2018 IPC 106.3.1 ( if some of these interconnect provide a complete storm system riser diagram with GPM loads at points of interconnection for clarity) **P2.0 shows 7 roof drain sets, if theses are inter-connected the 6" piping is undersized** Un-resolved-5). Plan Page P3.0: Where will the WH4 discharge to? There isn't a mop sink or floor drain below this WH location as shown in typical water heater detail. Provide place of discharge for this water heater in accordance with -2018 IPC 504.6 thru 504.7.2 (** pan drain can't discharge to Bait sink -IPC 504.7.2**) |
||
| 10/14/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The associated development package TD-DEV-0424-00140 must be approved before this building permit can be approved. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/08/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0624-01147 - TD-DEV-0424-00140 Bass Pro 1500 E Tucson Marketplace Bl TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the unapproved development package (TD-DEV-0424-00140) and found that the building plans are consistent with the unapproved development package as it relates to the zoning requirements (location, building footprint). Until the DP is approved by all reviewers Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 2. COMMENT: The total building area listed on the Architectural Site Plan, 101,653 does not match the square footage listed within the footprint and utilized in the calculations, 100,974, on the DP. The square footage shall match. 3. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any updates made to the building plans or the development package does not affect zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 10/07/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/12/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |