Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0623-01535
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/14/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0623-01535 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Daljit Benipal dbenipal@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/13/2023 4:34:35 PM 1. Provide Geotechnical Report for the proposed building per International Building Code 2018, Section 1803.1. 2. Refer to Structural Drawing s1.0, General Structural Notes. The Foundations section calls for Design Soil Bearing as 2,500 psf. Refer to Structural Calculations submitted. Page 289 for Foundation DF1 uses Soil Bearing Values as 3.0 ksf. Verify, revise calculations, and amend drawings as needed. 3. Refer to Structural Drawing s1.0, General Structural Notes. The Foundations section calls for Design Soil Bearing as 2,500 psf. Refer to Structural Calculations submitted. Page 293 for Foundation DF2 uses Soil Bearing Values as 3.0 ksf. Verify, revise calculations, and amend drawings as needed. 4. Refer to Structural Drawing s1.0, General Structural Notes. The Foundations section calls for Design Soil Bearing as 2,500 psf. Refer to Structural Calculations submitted. Page 297 for Foundation DF3 uses Soil Bearing Values as 3.0 ksf. Verify, revise calculations, and amend drawings as needed. 5. Refer to Structural Drawing s1.0, General Structural Notes. The Foundations section calls for Design Soil Bearing as 2,500 psf. Refer to Structural Calculations submitted. Page 301 for Foundation DF4 uses Soil Bearing Values as 3.0 ksf. Verify, revise calculations, and amend drawings as needed. 6. Refer to Structural Drawing s1.0, General Structural Notes. The Foundations section calls for Design Soil Bearing as 2,500 psf. Refer to Structural Calculations submitted. Page 305 for Foundation DFA uses Soil Bearing Values as 3.0 ksf. Verify, revise calculations, and amend drawings as needed. 7. Refer to Structural Drawing s1.0, General Structural Notes. The Foundations section calls for Design Soil Bearing as 2,500 psf. Refer to Structural Calculations submitted. Page 309 for Foundation DFB uses Soil Bearing Values as 3.0 ksf. Verify, revise calculations, and amend drawings as needed. 8. Structural steel, components and fasteners for the roof screen are to be protected against corrosion in accordance with AISC 360 Section B.13 as indicated in IBC 2018 Section 2203.1. 9. Designer is to coordinate venting and drainage hole requirements for HSS tube members that are galvanized using the hot-dip galvanizing process. Provide for plugs as needed. AWS D-19.0 calls for welds on galvanized steel to be free of zinc. Field welds on galvanized parts requires the removal of the zinc coating in the area of weld. Provide zinc paint (approved by the galvanizer) and apply as required to the weld and steel area to provide protection. 1. Provide galvanized bolts on the roof screen framing connections. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/5/2023 1:28:30 PM 1. Sheet G2.0: The telecommunication and electrical room doors encroach into the path of egress. Provide door swings that are in accordance with Section 1005.7.1. 2. Sheet G2.0: There is a room indicated with question marks. Provide clarification as to the use of this room. 3. Sheet A1.1: The egress balcony requires wall separation between the balcony and the structure. The exception of Section 1021.2 does not apply due to the dead end. Provide a properly rated wall between the egress balcony and the structure in accordance with Section 1021.2. See Section 1020.1, Section 708.3 w/ exceptions. Notate any exceptions on the plans. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Neil Samaan nsamaan@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/26/2023 11:21:05 PM Approved/Subject to field approval for shell and core phase Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/29/2023 12:06:21 PM Electrical Review of RINCON By: Ron Ross PE e1.3 electrical power plan - roof: Could not locate Keynote 1. e1.s electrical power plan - parking: Should call out conduit size for Keynote 1. e4.1 electrical one line diagram: Comment: Primary feeder to T1 is way oversized for its purpose and the conductors would not even fit into the 480-volt 50-amp circuit breaker. T2 is oversized and is being fed by a 200-amp circuit breaker. T3 is way oversized for its purpose and is being fed by a 100-amp circuit breaker. Circuit breaker could nuisance trip due to large inrush currents. Comment only: Feeder to CU-2.2 is larger than needed. Need to show or call out for surge protection for New SES panel per NEC 230.67 Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/9/2023 5:51:45 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). second floor water heater on plan page P4.1 needs to be in a pan and have its drains piped to a waste receptor or exterior. - IPC 504.6, 504.7. 504.7.2 2). Plan page P1.1 shows overflow roof drain conductors to exterior, Plan page P2.3 doesn't show the secondary roof drain locations Plan pages need to correlate -IPC 106.3 3). Add the gutter & downspout sizes to the roof drainage table on plan page A3.0. -IPC 1106.3, 1106.6 4). Add water heater information to plan page P0.0 -IPC 501.5 5). Include the site utility piping plan with plan submittal for continuation of water, sewer, & storm as stated throughout plan pages. - IPC 106.3.1 |
||
| 07/06/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Zoning Comment | ||
| 06/29/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0623-01535 10455 E. Drexel Rd. - PAD-12 New Medical Office Building Shell (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: June 29, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in PAD-12 (UDC 4.7.24), Medical Office is an allowed use in the PAD. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated unapproved Development Package TD-DEV-0523-00235. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/20/2023 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe on a site plan. The development package is not a substitute for a complete site plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018. | ||
| 07/12/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Separate permits required for: * underground fire line * fire sprinkler * fire alarm |
||
| 06/24/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |