Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0623-01496
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/29/2023 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
07/14/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
06/23/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0623-01496 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/23/2023 8:07:08 AM S2.0 – Show TJI span dimension in plan is it 29’-11” as shown in A1.0? S2.0 and calculation – Keynote 1 shows “14 TJI 560 series rafters at 24” throughout…” yet calculation sheet 5 shows discrepancy of “TJI-560 (11 7/8”) @ 2’-0” O.C…”. Also roof span table in sheet 6 does not show span width over 29’-11”. Calculation – Sheet 3: What is the risk category number determining the wind load per City of Tucson Amendments to the 2018 International Building Code? Calculation - City of Tucson Amendments to the 2018 International Building Code adds new Section 1609.5.1.1 Uplift resistance to minimize microburst effects. Show the determination: 1. Design-based wind uplift criteria or 2. Prescriptivebased wind uplift criteria. Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/23/2023 8:06:39 AM A4.0 – Does not show new mechanical roof top unit such as evaporative cooler. Where is the roof access? Mechanical(M) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/23/2023 8:06:54 AM Mechanical Roof equipment access not shown accordance with 2018 IMC section 306.3. Plumbing Missing plumbing plans: A1.0 keynote 12 and 13 states “refer to plumbing plan for additional information” but no plumbing plans were submitted Electrical(E) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/23/2023 8:06:23 AM |
||
07/14/2023 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structure was built in 1947, therefore, minor historic demo documentation required. Application and checklist found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/historic_demolition_application_form.pdf | ||
06/21/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-DMO-0623-01496 2886 N. 1st. Ave. Partial Demo for Fire Damage Repair TRANSMITTAL: June 21, 2023 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for Architectural Documentation prior to demolition of historic buildings (UDC 3.12.1). & .10. The Pima County Assessor’s effective construction date for your building or structure is 1947. The actual construction date may be earlier. Buildings, portions of buildings or structures that are 50 years of age or older must be architecturally documented prior to demolition. Documentation will be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Office before a permit is issued. Demolition (Historic and Older Structures) Application and General Information may be downloaded (PDF) at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-application-forms-submittal-requirements Return completed documentation to PDSDHistoric@tucsonaz.gov. Applicant will be contacted within 5 working days if additional materials are required for review. |
||
06/27/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
06/14/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |