Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0525-00973
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2025 | Commercial Electrical Standard | APPROVED | Electrical(E) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 8/3/2025 6:37:02 AM |
||
| 08/04/2025 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | APPROVED | Mechanical(M) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 8/3/2025 6:36:13 AM |
||
| 08/04/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | APPROVED | Plumbing(P) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 8/3/2025 6:35:21 AM |
||
| 08/04/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/04/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/3/2025 6:39:26 AM 1. T0.0 / Scope of Work / Missing description of construction work. Please provide descriptive statement of work or scope of work that captures Arch, Structure and MEP disciplines (2018 IBC Section 107.2.1). Building review response narrative were missing. 2. T0.0 / Code Analysis / Missing building code analysis: Provide building code information such as occupancy classification, number of occupants, areas (SF), construction type, and scope of fire sprinkler and fire alarm (2018 IBC Section 107.2.1). Building review response narrative were missing nor drawing updated. 3. General / Means of Egress Plan / Provide life safety plan: Missing means of egress or life safety plan of modified occupancies. Drawing doesn’t state which rooms or occupants are affected in this construction design (2018 IBC Section 107.2.3). Building review response narrative were missing. 4. S2.0 / Partial Foundation Plan / Missing Architectural site and floor plan. Please provide Architectural site and floor plan clarifying the scope of work coordinated with this partial foundation plan (2018 IBC Section 107.2.1). Building review response narrative were missing. 5. S2.0 / Partial Foundation Plan / Provide concrete pad dimensions: Keynote 10 states to verify dimension with owner however show this prior to release of construction (2018 IBC Section 107.2.1). Building review response narrative were missing. 6. S2.0 / Partial Foundation Plan / Missing new fence elevations and details: Keynote 8 describes new fence and screen walls but this drawing is missing. Building review response narrative were missing. 7. P1.0 / Plumbing Floor Plan / Missing New Site Plan: Show locations of new exterior equipment in relation to site plan in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 107.2.6. S2.0 shows removal of existing metal building on keynote 7 but missing demolition and new exterior elevations. Building review response narrative were missing. RESUBMITTAL DIRECTIONS: • All corrections must be clouded, delta numbered, with a brief explanation within the plan sheet or the title block of the sheet. For corrections or revision to whole plan sheets, you need only cloud the sheet number and provide the delta identification number, with a brief explanation of the change(s). • As part of the resubmittal, please collate all revised sheets into the electronic document (PDF) and submit a complete and full plan set. We cannot accept individual sheets in response to review comments, since the entire plan set is required for approval and permitting. • Please include with the resubmittal a separate response narrative, which is numbered or itemized to correspond to each of the noted plan review comments items. • This response narrative must clearly address how each issue was corrected or resolved and indicate where the information may be found within the construction documents. The response narrative must be typewritten, on letterhead noting the project name, with the Permit Application Number. Failure to provide this response narrative may result in review delays or rejection of the resubmittal. • Once all electronic construction documents (plan sheets, energy compliance certificates, reports, calculations, etc.) have been revised according to the above directions. Please resubmit the complete revised plan set with a separate copy of response narrative PDF through the municipality to complete the review. • Review of revised construction documents in response to this letter may take upwards of 5 (five) business days, depending on the size of the project and the volume of plans in queue at time of resubmittal. Structural(S) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 8/3/2025 6:34:25 AM |
||
| 07/30/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |