Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0524-00983
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 06/25/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/27/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/12/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/1/2024 5:00:12 AM 1. Sheet A2.0 – Egress symbols and legends are not used in proposed plan per 2018 IBC chapter 10. Provide egress plan showing most remote point/distance, point of decision/common path of travel, exits, direction of travel to exit, exit access path, common path of egress, luminous egress path markings (section 1008). Show remoteness between exits or exit access doors per 2018 IBC section 1007.1.1. 2. Sheet A2.0 – What is required and provided exit distance from common area C? 3. Adjacent tenant appears to have only single exit door location. Show required and provided travel distance to exit. 4. Sheet A2.0 – Stair is not shown. Provide the mezzanine floor plan where the stair leads to clarify the scope ofmezzanine. Sheet A0.0 shows that this is 1 story structure so clarify this. 5. Provide floor plan and reflected ceiling plan of mezzanine. 6. Provide building section through basement, 1st floor, mezzanine and penthouse to clarify the scope of work. 7. Sheet A3.1 – Note 304 X/A9.X incomplete detail. 8. Sheet A4.0 – Locate roof access. 9. Sheet D4.0 and A4.0 – Existing and new roof drains are not located. Sheet A9.0 shows new downspout and roof drains, but these details are not cross referenced back in to roof plans. Cross reference all details to clarify scope of work. 10. Provide architectural floor plan and reflected ceiling plans of basement and mezzanine. P2.2, E1.1 and E1.2 show storage area of work. Where is the egress plan? Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/10/2024 8:19:21 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). General: Need to address building plan review comment #9- 2018 IPC 1101.2 2). Plan page P2.0: Plan page is missing a gas appliance detail that correctly depicts the shut off valve & sediment trap piping arrangement. Add a gas appliance connection in accordance with -2018 IFGC 408.4 ((sediment trap can't be installed on the horizontal run as shown on gas riser) |
||
| 06/25/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Fernando Garcia Planning & Development Services Department – Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0524-00983 – Commercial Building – Addition/Alteration 5950 E Broadway Bl, Tucson, AZ 85711 Plan Review (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 28, 2024 1. (Comment) The submitted site plan indicates the addition of two new trash enclosures. This constitutes a change which requires submittal of a development package (DP) per Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 3.3.3.G. Provide detail of trash enclosures and indicate ADA accessible walkways from building entrances to trash enclosures. 2. (Comment) Remove signage from submitted plans (cover page and elevations). Signage will be requested per separate permit and should not be depicted on submitted documents for this permit. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Resubmit permit as a development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Fernando L. Garcia at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/09/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/28/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |