Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0524-00983
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2024 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 10/02/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/19/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer mnelson@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/11/2024 8:18:20 PM Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/15/2024 11:38:04 PM 1. Sheet A2.0 – Egress symbols and legends are not used in proposed plan per 2018 IBC chapter 10. Provide egress plan showing most remote point/distance, point of decision/common path of travel, exits, direction of travel to exit, exit access path, common path of egress, luminous egress path markings (section 1008). Show remoteness between exits or exit access doors per 2018 IBC section 1007.1.1. ◦ Sheet A1.1 – Sheet A0.0 general building summary indicates occupancy group A-2 and M for the future. Meanwhile egress plan sheet A1.1 shows exit travel distance of over 250 feet (309’-6”, 257’-2”, and 251’-0”). 2018 International Building Code table 1017.2 table limits to 250 feet for A and M occupancies. Section 1017.2 limitation. Exit access travel distance shall not exceed the value given in Table 1017.2. 2. Sheet A2.0 – What is required and provided exit distance from common area C? See 1st comment and sheet A1.1 shows common area C exceeds limitation according to 2018 IBC table 1017.2. 3. Adjacent tenant appears to have only single exit door location. Show required and provided travel distance to exit. See comment 1) response. Sheet A0.0 expecting future A-2 and M occupancies but exceeding distance limitations. Provide the scope of work area in SF and show limitation of construction work area. Sheet A1.0 site plan seems to capture the entire area of “This project” including round 1 and storage. 4. Sheet A2.0 – Stair is not shown. Provide the mezzanine floor plan where the stair leads to clarify the scope of mezzanine. Sheet A0.0 shows that this is 1 story structure so clarify this but sheet D2.3 shows “second floor” demolition plan. Sheet A3.1 note 312 also describes as second floor. Sheet A6.0 section shows level 2 not penthouse. 5. Provide floor plan and reflected ceiling plan of second floor. Although mezzanine reference removed, Sheet D2.3 shows demolition floor plan – “second floor.” Sheet A0.0 general building summary proposed shows as “1 story.” Number of stories has to be defined and coordinated in design documents (2018 IBC section 504). 6. Provide building section through basement, 1st floor, second floor and penthouse to clarify the scope of work. Sheet A7.0 also shows no interior work on second floor but sheet D2.3 shows demolition work. Keynote 024 points at wall with double doors need to clarify scope. 7. Sheet A3.1 – Note 304 X/A9.X incomplete detail. Resolved. 8. Sheet A4.0 – Locate roof access. Keynote 411 points out to a solid wall in sheet A4.0 and A4.1: state the method of access. 9. Sheet D4.0 and A4.0 – Existing and new roof drains are not located. Sheet A9.0 shows new downspout and roof drains, but these details are not cross-referenced back in to roof plans. Cross reference all details to clarify scope of work. Contradicting scope of work indicated that roof to “remain” but to “patch and repair.” Provide existing roofing materials and clearly state its demolition and new scope of repair work. 10. Provide architectural floor plan and reflected ceiling plans of basement and mezzanine. P2.2, E1.1 and E1.2 show storage area of work. Where is the egress plan? Reflected ceiling plans are showing floor components such as doors so not a ceiling view. Show only ceiling components for clarity. 11. Sheet A2.1 – Wall type note 4 states underside of roof deck with type X gwb but UL listed assembly detail is missing. 12. Sheet A2.1 – Wall type note 5 calls out for fire stopping materials but detail drawing is missing. 13. Sheet A2.1 – Wall type note 6 indicates wall backing but this detail is missing. 14. Structural calculation ultimate design wind speed shows at “103 MPH” but City of Tucson amendment section 1609.1.1 shows Basic Wind Speed Figure for Risk Category ll at 105 mph. 15. Structural calculation notes states “to be completed in later phase” this scope is not mentioned in A0.0 like wise in sheet S1.1 building code wind note. 16. Sheet S1.1 – Reference applicable special inspection sections from 2018 IBC chapter 17. Show content of statement of special inspections per section 1704.2.1. Mechanical(M) Reviewer (from previous submittal TUC9562001.052824) Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 6/10/2024 11:50:54 AM Electrical(E) Reviewer (from previous submittal TUC9562001.052824) Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 5/30/2024 10:26:40 AM 1. E0.1 SYMBOL LEGENDS, NOTES, INDEX : Electrical Sheet index has two duplicate E2.1 sheets listed. 2. E2.1 ELECTRICAL HVAC FLOOR PLAN – NORTH: Could not locate Keyed Notes 2 and 10. 3. E4.1 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM: Could not locate Keyed Note #8. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/19/2024 10:54:22 AM Second Plumbing Review: Resolved-1). General: Need to address building plan review comment #9- 2018 IPC 1101.2 Un-resolved-2). Plan page P2.0: Plan page is missing a gas appliance detail that correctly depicts the shut off valve & sediment trap piping arrangement. Add a gas appliance connection in accordance with -2018 IFGC 408.4 ((sediment trap can't be installed on the horizontal run as shown on gas riser) |
||
| 09/13/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |