Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Permit Number - TC-COM-0523-01176
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | TC-COM-0523-01175 & TC-COM-0523-01176 SHARE PLANS | ||
| 06/26/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-COM-0523-01175 & TC-COM-0523-01176 SHARE PLANS Activity Number: TC-COM-0523-01176 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Janet Matz jmatz@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/16/2023 3:18:25 PM no structural work was included as part of this submittal Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/24/2023 8:23:18 PM Sheet A0.0 scope of work does not provide any deferred submittals. Are fire sprinkler system and/or alarm deferred submittals? Sheet A0.0 code review does not indicate fire alarm system (Y or N)? Sheet A0.0 code review shows note about use of combustible materials for “Type ll” while type of construction states Type VB. Sheet A2.0 floor plan tags new demising all type A which in wall type schedule is for “existing wall”. A1 wall type is not identified in wall schedule. Keynote 4 shows to “provide type ‘x’ gypsum board at all rated partitions” while not used in any wall types. Provide UL assembly number when providing rated partitions. If future tenant is uncertain and code review defining as “Separated uses/Y” then 2018 IBC Table 508.4 still requires 1 hour for B and A-2 (E.g. Restaurant) in sprinklered building. Provide penetration details when rated partition is applicable. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/24/2023 8:24:13 PM "...work on this project involves only the suite shell preps for both suite 135 & 145 and that any additional work for either suite will be through a future permit submittal." Electrical(E) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/24/2023 8:23:55 PM "...work on this project involves only the suite shell preps for both suite 135 & 145 and that any additional work for either suite will be through a future permit submittal. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/25/2023 12:01:26 PM Second Plumbing Review: 1). SAME- Cover sheet & scope states tenant improvement, Permit description states TC-COM-0523-01175 is Shell permit, both submittals appear to be the same plan set? -IPC 106.3.1 ** If this is shared plan, upload the updated TC-COM-0523-01175 plan to this record** 2). SAME -Mercantile occupancy load 33 requires high/low drinking fountain & service sink in bakery side, the plumbing pages do not reflect those required fixtures & piping illustrations -IPC 403.1 ** The plan set with this record still shows Mercantile 33** 3). SAME-plumbing piping plans do not reflect any kitchen cooking equipment, prep sinks, hand sinks , grease interceptor, gas piping etc. -IPC/IFGC 106.3.** The plan set with this record still shows same scope that includes tenant improvements** 4). SAME-Elevated water heater on plan page P2.0 requires a pan & drain piped to a waste receptor or exterior. -IPC 504.7.1, 504.7.2** The plan set with this record doesn't show compliance** 5). SAME-one of the Sanitary connection points is flowing in the incorrect direction on plan page P1.0 - IPC 706.3** The plan set with this record doesn't show compliance** |
||
| 06/22/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |