Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0523-01175
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | TC-COM-0523-01175 & TC-COM-0523-01176 SHARE PLANS | ||
| 06/26/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-COM-0523-01175 & TC-COM-0523-01176 SHARE PLANS Activity Number: TC-COM-0523-01175 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Janet Matz jmatz@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/24/2023 3:13:11 AM Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/24/2023 8:21:58 PM Sheet A0.0 scope of work does not provide any deferred submittals. Are fire sprinkler system and/or alarm deferred submittals? Sheet A0.0 code review does not indicate fire alarm system (Y or N)? Sheet A0.0 code review shows note about use of combustible materials for “Type ll” while type of construction states Type VB. Sheet A2.0 floor plan tags new demising all type A which in wall type schedule is for “existing wall”. A1 wall type is not identified in wall schedule. Keynote 4 shows to “provide type ‘x’ gypsum board at all rated partitions” while not used in any wall types. Provide UL assembly number when providing rated partitions. If future tenant is uncertain and code review defining as “Separated uses/Y” then 2018 IBC Table 508.4 still requires 1 hour for B and A-2 (E.g. Restaurant) in sprinklered building. Provide penetration details when rated partition is applicable. Mechanical(M) Reviewer (from previous submittal TUC9254001.050923) Janet Matz jmatz@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/24/2023 3:12:53 AM Electrical(E) Reviewer (from previous submittal TUC9254001.050923) Janet Matz jmatz@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/24/2023 3:12:40 AM Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/25/2023 11:49:28 AM Second Plumbing Review: **Work Scope per Updated sheet A0.0 =Preparing units for future tenants. The Tenant buildouts will be permitted separately ** All subject to field inspections 1). OK- Mercantile occupancy load 33 requires high/low drinking fountain & service sink in bakery side, the plumbing pages do not reflect those required fixtures & piping illustrations -IPC 403.1 ** Sheet A0.0 occupancy loads & types revised to B-15, also see work scope** 2). OK- plumbing piping plans do not reflect any kitchen cooking equipment, prep sinks, hand sinks , grease interceptor, gas piping etc. -IPC/IFGC 106.3.1**Work Scope per Updated sheet A0.0 =Preparing units for future tenants. The Tenant buildouts will be permitted separately ** 3). Ok 4). OK |
||
| 06/22/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |