Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.4
Permit Number - TC-COM-0423-01051
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/09/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment | ||
| 08/09/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0423-01051 7525 E. Speedway Bl. – O-3 New Building - Education (4th Review) TRANSMITTAL: August 9, 2023 This comment was not addressed. Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in O-3 zone (UDC 4.7.15), Educational Use: Elementary and Secondary is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-3), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.3.D and 4.9.13.K. 1. This comment was not addressed. Issued DP21-0352 and TD-DEV-0423-00224 in review do not show the configuration on sheet CS.3. until a DP is approved showing the correct configuration Zoning cannot approve this plan. Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06 must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this building plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 08/14/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REVIEW COMPLETED | Structural(S) Reviewer Daljit Benipal dbenipal@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 7/20/2023 9:12:59 AM NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 8/2/2023 11:23:43 AM Mechanical(M) Reviewer Neil Samaan nsamaan@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 7/13/2023 7:25:29 PM All corrections complied Approved/subject to field approval Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 7/15/2023 6:19:00 PM Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 8/13/2023 11:01:33 PM Fourth Plumbing Review: OK Subject To field inspections Copy to clip bo 1). OK 2). OK 3). OK 4). OK 5). OK 6). Resolved-Food prep/coffee sink on plan pages CS2.0, A-B2.0, P-B1.0, P-B1.1 needs to discharge to a grease interceptor. - IPC 1003.1, Tucson Plumbing Amendments ** Provide Documentation from Utility authority allowing no interceptor as stated in response** Email form utility provided states no grease trap required if no food prep occurs, plan page CS2.0 states food prep. =( SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS For Determination**) See attached email in reviewer folder 7).OK 8). OK 9). OK 10). OK -Added Lavatory detail 218 on P2.1 also needs an ASSE 1070 mixing valve -IPC 419.5 **Subject to field inspections** |
||
| 08/07/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |