Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0423-01028
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2023 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED IN Studio Session 165-051-629 -See Linked Records and Internal Notes - Total of 10 permits off this Studio Session | ||
| 05/30/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED IN Studio Session 165-051-629 -See Linked Records and Internal Notes - Total of 10 permits off this Studio Session | ||
| 05/25/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0323-00800 , TC-COM-0323-00923, TC-COM-0423-01026, TC-COM-0423-01027, TC-COM-0423-01028, TC-COM-0423-01029, TC-COM-0423-01030, TC-COM-0423-01031, TC-COM-0423-01032, TC-COM-0423-01033 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Daljit Benipal dbenipal@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/23/2023 11:08:48 AM NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. Building(B) Reviewer Don Wilkins dwilkins@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 5/23/2023 4:01:53 PM 1. Please revise to include the design occupant load for Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10. (2018 IBC Table 1004.5 Mechanical(M) Reviewer Neil Samaan nsamaan@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 4/1/2023 2:01:38 PM Approved/subject to field approval Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 5/22/2023 6:59:07 PM 2nd Electrical Review By Ron Ross PE This set was originally reviewed by a Local Tucson Code reviewer and then reviewed by myself. The local AHJ’s comments were not completely addressed and are included with my additional comments below. Please respond more clearly than simply “Complied” as it is difficult to determine compliance without an explanation. I was able to accept a couple of responses, however, most still need to be addressed. E1.1. Ref Plan sheet: For clarity, please identify the North and South Distribution Meter Stacks on the Electrical Site Plan. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Did not see any response, but did see meter stacks on buildings. Accepted. E1.2 Ref; Plan sheet: Outdoor Lighting Calculations. (a) The Site lighting plan shows 28 ‘SW1’ exterior luminaires but the Lumen Calculation shows 33 luminaires. Please clarify. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Did not see any compliance on my supposedly updated E1.2 sheet. E1.2 Ref; Plan sheet: The adjacent property to the west of this project is Residential. The light poles on the west boundary of the new commercial project are 24’ per the site plan (not sure if that includes the concrete pole base). Verify that there is no conflict with the ‘Commercial Property Adjacent to Residential Property’ requirements stated in section 401.3.1. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Did not see any compliance or response. E2.1: General comment concerning Sheets E2.1 to reference Details/Enlarged Electrical Plans. The details do not correlate or cannot be located. (a) Unit ‘F105’. Where is detail A1/AB101 located? (b) Unit C. Where is Detail A1/AS101 located? (c) Why are Details #1/E2.6 (COMMUNITY LOUNGE 10-100), # 4/E2.6 (COMMUNITY LOUNGE 2-100), # 5/E2.6 (no room identification) , Referenced to plan sheet E2.6 Roof Plan? Why is Panel ‘M’ (not shown in the line diagram? (d) Why are Details # 4/E2.5 OFFICE AND LOBBY, # 4/E2.5 UNIT D, AND # 6/E2.5 LAUNDRY Referenced to plan sheet E2.5 ‘ENLARGED COMMUNITY LIGHTING AND POWER’? (e) Ref; Plan sheet E2.5. Identify the unit shown in Details # 4. (f) Show lighting controls for all non-dwelling spaces and correlate with 2018 IECC section 405. (g) There are 2 plan sheets labeled as E2.5. was this intentional? (h) Ref; Plan sheet E 1.1. Where is Detail or Enlarged plan 2/E1.1? (I) Ref; Plan sheet E2.4 Enlarged Details # 6, #7. Please show Breaker panel location. (j) Enlarged Detail # 3. What is the difference between Units ‘D1’ and ‘D2’ and also ‘E1’ and ‘E2’? If different electrical/ lighting floorplan, provide an Enlarged Electrical floorplan for each. If not different indicate, this on the Enlarged Electrical plan Details. 2nd review response: Comments/questions were not addressed. E2.2: Keynotes 2 and 4 shall also require that the exterior receptacles shall be weather proof and GFCI protected. Comment applies to other sheets where applicable. 2nd review response: Comment was not addressed. E2.4: Could not locate power panels in units F and G. 2nd review response: Comment was not addressed. E3.1 Ref Electrical Line Diagrams. Plan sheet and Panel schedules. (a) Plan sheets E4.1, E4.2. Provide for signage on Panel ‘HPE’ and associated electrical service equipment indicating type and location of Emergency or Stand by power source. (b) Provide signaling devices as required. NEC art 700.6, 700.7, 701.6, 701.7. (c) Is the Elevator Sump Pump on a 1-pole or 2-pole circuit breaker? Please clarify. (d) Why is KEYNOTE #5 attached to the Unit Panels? Please clarify. (e) Provide a Service and distribution panel schedule and identify the load served for all the Sub-Main breakers in the Electrical Service and Distribution panels downstream. For example; Which sub-main breaker feeds Panel ‘HPA’ ?. (f) Why are there no panel schedules for Panels ‘HPR’, ‘HPC’, ‘LD’? (g) Panel ‘M’ is not shown in the Line Diagram. Please clarify. (g) Indicate Voltage, Phase, and Amp rating for the Main Electrical Service on the Line Diagram. (h) TEP is not responsible for providing 3- phase service secondary installations. Please provide the electrical service secondary conduit, conductor Sizes and types on the Line Diagram. (I) Provide Labeling affixed to the Main Service and downstream electrical equipment as required per NEC art 110,22 for the Series Rated AC system. (j) Verify compliance with the ARC ENERGY REDUCTION requirements at the Main Service Overcurrent Device per NEC art 240.87. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Comments/questions were not addressed. 2.5: There are two different E2.5 sheets in set. 2nd sheet has no comments. Need to renumber/correct. 2nd review response: Comment was not addressed. E2.6 Plan Sheet shows the Condensing units fed from the ‘Respective Residence unit Panels’ Branch circuits #22,24. This is not correlate on the Panel schedules. Please clarify. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Comment was not addressed. E4.1 Ref Plan sheet: The Luminaire (Light Fixture) schedule is not complete. Please include all the Luminaires proposed for this project and indicate whether the exterior Luminaires have shielded or unshielded optics. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Did not see any response, but did find exterior fixtures on another sheet. Accepted. E4.1 Unit Panel Schedules Notes, Plan sheet: (a) Provide LISTED COMBINATION-TYPE ARC-FAULT circuit interrupters for all 120 volt 15- and 20-amp branch circuits as required per NEC art 210.12(A). (b) Provide Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter Protection as required per NEC art 210.8. (c) The panel schedules for Unit Panels ‘D1’ and ‘D2’ appear to be identical. The Load Analysis shows a large difference between the units AC/Heating loads. Why is the ‘D2’ Units AC/Heating load only 208 VA? Also, Units ‘E1’, ‘E2’? The panel schedules for these units all show a 40-amp OCPD for the load. Revise the building load calculations as necessary. Response: See electrical engineer’s response letter. Which simply stated “Complied” 2nd review response: Comments/questions were not addressed. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 5/20/2023 8:53:57 PM Second Plumbing Review: 1). SAME-Plan page A4.1 needs to show primary scupper sizes, needs to show the required secondary scupper locations & sizes. & downspout sizes Along with sizing calculations. for Bldgs 1 thru 8 & 10. - IPC 1106.3, 1106.5, 1108 2). SAME-Plan page A4.2 needs to show primary & secondary roof details for Bldgs 1 thru 8 & 10. -IPC 1106.5, 1108 3). SAME-What is the roof draining method for new BLDG #3 shown on plan page A4.1 - IPC 1101.2 4). SAME- BLDG #10 on Civil Plan page 13, water service to Bldg. connection locations don't correlate with plan pages P3.2, P3.4, P3.5 -IPC 106.3.1 5). SAME-Bldg #3 laundry on plan page P3.2 has a larger capacity water heater than does Bldg. 9 common area & larger laundry on plan page P2.6? -IPC 604.3 |
||
| 05/17/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment | ||
| 05/16/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED IN Studio Session 165-051-629 -See Linked Records and Internal Notes - Total of 10 permits off this Studio Session ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0323-00800 2445 N Oracle Rd. – C-2 Multifamily (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL: May 16, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21), Multifamily is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4). 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP TD-DEV-1022-00007 and although it appears that the plans match until a DP approved Zoning cannot approve this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Iman.monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/01/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED IN Studio Session 165-051-629 -See Linked Records and Internal Notes - Total of 10 permits off this Studio Session | ||
| 04/27/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED IN Studio Session 165-051-629 -See Linked Records and Internal Notes - Total of 10 permits off this Studio Session |