Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0423-00991
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/05/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0423-00991 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Refer to Structural Calculations pages 392 of 403 to 397 of 403. The calculations show a retaining wall with 10 feet retained height and 11’-2” of Footing Width. Also, allowable soil bearing used is 2,000 psf. Identify the Retaining Wall on Structural Floor Plan and verify the allowable soil bearing used with the Geotechnical Report. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet GN.1: The occupant load for the office space has been calculated incorrectly. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance Table 1004.5 (2018 IBC). 2. General: No egress plans have been provided. Provide detailed egress plans. 3. Sheet A5.3: An interior exit stairway is not permitted to continue below its level of exit discharge unless an approved barrier is provided. Provide an approved barrier in accordance with Section 1023.8 (2018 IBC). 4. Sheet A7.2: Listed fire resistance rated assemblies typically are comprised of proprietary materials to achieve a complete assembly. Provide the complete the listed assembly details being used for the 2 hr rated wall between buildings and 1 hr stair shaft. Additionally, there are references to the UBC as well. Provided a completed and correct listed assembly. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied Set is signed and sealed by an Electrical Engineer from out of State and an Architect licensed in Arizona. The permit is rejected per Tucson city requirements for an electrical engineer to sign and seal an electrical design with a service larger than 400 amps. Contact City of Tucson Building Review dept and ask for approval for this current method and provide letter of approval. Otherwise, the set will need to be signed and sealed by a Professional Electrical Engineer licensed in Arizona. Tucson Exterior lumens calculation needs to be provided. E100 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN: Call Out Notes 5 & 8 not shown and should probably be General Notes. E101 LIGHTING,POWER & EQUIPMENT PLAN, BASEMENT PART 1: Two sets of Call Out Notes. Should clarify one as lighting and the other as power and also state that not all Notes used on each sheet. E200 CONDUIT PLAN: Call Out Notes 1, 4, 5, and 6 not used. If common notes, that would be expected, but Call Out Notes change from sheet to sheet. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing Review: 1). :Lavatory Faucet on plan page P001 Fixture schedule needs to be automatic type- Tucson Plumbing Code Amendment 419.6 2). The following 3" roof drain/conductors areas are undersized on plan page P102, -3004, 2992, 2890, 2875, & 2656 square foot areas. - IPC 1106.2 3). Occupancy types B & S1 with total load of 256 requires 2 toilets, 2 Lavs men, 2 toilets, 2 lavs women. - Update all affected pages - IPC 403.1, 403.2 4). add piping material types to plan page P001 -IPC 605.4, 702 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/11/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comments | ||
| 05/01/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: TC-COM-0423-00991 1875 West Valencia Road – C-2 New self storage facility (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 1, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. A demolition permit is required for the buildings proposed for demolition on Sheet A1.1. The required demolition permit shall be applied for on the Tucson Development Center Online under application type “Commercial Demolition Permit.” 2. Per Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), a development package is required for new non-residential buildings and structures. The development package shall meet the submittal requirements of Administrative Manual Section 2-06.0.0. The development package is a separate submittal and shall be applied for through the Tucson Development Center Online under application type “Development Package.” Zoning cannot approve this building permit until the development package has been submitted, reviewed, and approved by all review entities. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. |
||
| 05/04/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/17/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |