Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0323-00766
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/30/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0323-00766 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide accurate information regarding Current Codes per International Building Code 2018. The information provided on Geotechnical Report is incorrect since State has adopted latest Codes. The Geo Report calls for IBC 2012 on Section Seismicity on page 8 of the report. 2. The Geotechnical Report submitted calls for Site Class C on page 10n Seismicity. The Structural Drawing S1.0, Seismic Loads, calls for Site Class D. Verify and make revisions as needed. 3. The Seismic Parameters S1 and Ss shown on Geotechnical Report page 8 does not match with Structural Calculations submitted (page 1) and Structural Drawing S1.0 (Seismic Loads). Verify and make revisions as needed. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet A1.0: Provide clarification on how the existing service bays and new service bays are separated from the existing Audi dealership. Are they part of the same building that is the Audi dealership and this is considered nonseparated/separated mix use or is a fire wall being used to create a new building in accordance with Section 503.1? If considered the same building please provide the existing area of the Audi dealership and provide allowable area calculation in relation to the entire structure to ensure maximum allowable areas are compliant. It appears that a fire wall is being used but it is not clear. 2. Sheet A1.0: If a fire wall is being used to create a new building in accordance with Section 503.1, the fire wall is not rated properly. Provide a properly rated fire wall in accordance with Section 706.4 and Table 706.4. Additionally, provide a section of the fire wall. 3. Sheet A2.0: Roof drainage sizing calculations have not been provided. Provide roof drain sizing calculations to the roof plan in accordance with Section IPC 1106.1 & 1106.2 4. Sheet A2.0: GPM discharge amounts have not been provided for the roof/drain overflows. Provide the roof/drain overflows in accordance with Section IPC 1106.2 MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved E5.1 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES: Should call out KAIC ratings for panels to avoid resubmittals if Short circuit calculations were higher. However, included short circuit calculations imply the lowest standard KAIC ratings of standard panels will be sufficient PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing Review: 1). Lavatory mixing valve on Plan page P2.1 needs to be ASSE 1070 rated , the model chosen is not. -IPC 419.5 2). Eye Wash mixing valve on plan page P2.1 needs to ASSE 1071 rated - IPC 411.3 3). the roof drain conductors receiving the 1823 sq. ft. of roof need to be 4" on plan page P:1.2. -IPC 1106.2 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/07/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Address building comments. Questions: Patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082 |
||
| 04/10/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment | ||
| 04/05/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0323-00766 4690 E 22nd St. – C-2 Auto Sales – New Service Bay Addition (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: April 5, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21), Auto Sales is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.9.G.1& .2. 1. As DP TD-DEV-0323-00163 has not completed its first review Zoning cannot compart the plans for compliance. Zone will review on the next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/14/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |