Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0125-00077
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Engineering Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Water - PDSD Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/29/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/28/2025 11:29:26 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. GENERAL - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: Please have the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge of this project complete and return the City of Tucson Special Inspections Certificate with signatures. The form can be downloaded at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/planning developmentservices/documents/special_inspection_certificate.pdf 3. SHEET S-1 - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Please provide a copy of the site-specific geotechnical report referenced in the structural general notes. The report should support the appropriateness of the selected foundation system for the project site. All submitted geotechnical reports must be dated no later than three years from the submittal date. Outdated reports must be accompanied by a letter from a qualified geotechnical engineer stating that the report requirements are still valid, or stating what items may have changed. All building code references must be updated to the current code adopted by the City. 4. SHEET S-4 - COLUMN SCHEDULE: The Column Schedule on Sheet S-4 does not specify a minimum embedment depth for anchor bolts at structural steel columns. Per the structural general notes, the seismic force resisting system for the proposed mezzanine is a cantilevered column system. Please confirm that the typical embedment lengths prescribed in Detail 2/S-3 are sufficient to achieve the moment-fixity required for a cantilevered column design. Supporting calculations may be required. 5. SHEETS M-12 & R5.0 - MECHANICAL UNITS: The Mechanical Roof Plan, Sheet M-12, and Mechanical Equipment Plan, R5.0, indicate multiple new mechanical units weighing between 700 lb and 12,000 lb to be added to the existing roof. The addition of mechanical units weighing over 300 lb requires an evaluation of the existing framing by a professional engineer. Please provide a structural roof framing plan with the proposed units called out. If any reinforcement of the existing framing or proposed openings is required, please provide additional structural details. Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/18/2025 7:13:27 PM 1. Provide Special Inspections Intermediate Certificate ◦ A Special Inspections Intermediate Certificate must be submitted and reviewed prior to issuance of this permit. Provide signed/dated certificate: S-2 shows special inspection tables but signed certification missing. ◦ You may obtain the form at the following link: ◦ https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-developmentservices/documents/special_inspection_certificate.pdf ◦ The Condition is added to the permit and then satisfied upon approval of the form |
||
| 01/29/2025 | Commercial Electrical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/22/2025 4:47:23 PM 1. E-21: Comment only, Could not locate Electrical Notes 2 and 17. 2. E-41: Comment only, Could not locate Bridge Electrical Notes 4 and 6. 3. Shall have an electrical engineer to sign and seal designs that exceed 400 amps per Tucson City’s Commercial electrical submittal requirement. Design looks acceptable and current EOR may want to petition for a waiver with Tucson or petition Arizona board to be recognized as an Electrical PE too. 4. E71: Comment only: Supposed to provide short circuit calculations for all new panels per Tucson City’s Commercial electrical submittal requirement. Should have provided statement the Powerwall exceeds local Arc fault availability. 5. E-71: Panel PP is not protected properly as it is only a 100 amp panel per panel schedule on sheet E-61. Upsize panel or correct One-Line Diagram. |
||
| 01/29/2025 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/27/2025 3:44:46 PM 1. General - Provide COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate. Any other APPROVED certifying agency is acceptable. - 2018 IECC Section C403.3.2 HVAC equipment performance requirements. 2. General - Provide Heat Load Calculations - 2018 IECC Section C403.1.1 Calculation of heating and cooling loads. |
||
| 01/29/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/26/2025 10:13:04 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). General: Missing Plumbing Demo Plan. Provide Plumbing Demo Plan. -2018 IPC 106.3.1 2). Plan pages P-11, P-12: The One compartment sink in Prep room can't connect to the sanitary system. Connect the 1 compartment sink to the grease system. -Tucson 2018 Chapter 10 Plumbing code Amendments. |
||
| 01/29/2025 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/22/2025 4:47:23 PM 1. E-21: Comment only, Could not locate Electrical Notes 2 and 17. 2. E-41: Comment only, Could not locate Bridge Electrical Notes 4 and 6. 3. Shall have an electrical engineer to sign and seal designs that exceed 400 amps per Tucson City’s Commercial electrical submittal requirement. Design looks acceptable and current EOR may want to petition for a waiver with Tucson or petition Arizona board to be recognized as an Electrical PE too. 4. E71: Comment only: Supposed to provide short circuit calculations for all new panels per Tucson City’s Commercial electrical submittal requirement. Should have provided statement the Powerwall exceeds local Arc fault availability. 5. E-71: Panel PP is not protected properly as it is only a 100 amp panel per panel schedule on sheet E-61. Upsize panel or correct One-Line Diagram. |
||
| 01/23/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/15/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |