Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00168
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/21/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/16/2024 5:15:09 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. S001 - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Please provide a copy of the site-specific geotechnical report referenced in the structural general notes. The report should support the appropriateness of the selected foundation system for the project site. All building code references must be updated to the current code adopted by the City. 3. S001 - WIND DESIGN DATA: Per the 2018 International Building Code, Section 1603.1.4.5, construction documents shall indicate "design wind pressures and their applicable zones with dimensions to be used for exterior component and cladding materials... [expressed] in pounds per square foot." 4. S001 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Specialty engineer RBI Structures has specified that the cast-in-place concrete slab and foundation shall have a minimum 28-day concrete compressive strength of 4 ksi (Refer to Sheet S0.0). This conflicts with the compressive design called out on the structural general notes, Sheet S001. Please confirm which note controls. If the foundation is determined to be 3 ksi concrete, please confirm that the anchorage of all embedded and post-installed anchors specified by "Tommy" are still sufficient. 5. S101 - CONFIRM DESIGN: At the plan-west end of the Foundation Plan, S101, two sonotube footings are cast directly against each other with no observable clearance. Please confirm that this is acceptable to the geotechnical engineer and reduce the allowable soil bearing at these combined footings if required. Provide a minimum embedment depth for the 24" diameter sonotube. 6. S302 - CONFIRM DESIGN: Details 1 & 2/S302 illustrate a block-out of the slab on grade for future steel columns by RBI Structures. The details do not show reinforcement of the resulting reentrant corners. Please confirm that no additional reinforcement is required, apart from the typical fiber reinforcement, at the typical column block-outs. 7. S0.0 - SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA: The structural general notes by RBI Structures provide design criteria for seismic loading that appears incorrect. Please verify the values for seismic ground accelerations Ss and S1, and express these values in units of "g". 8. S0.0 - LIVE LOADS The structural general notes by RBI list live loads for elevated framing at the unoccupied storage areas. These areas appear to be only accessible by pull-down stairs and thus it is acceptable classify them as "unoccupied". However, for the publicly accessible stairs and Observation Area shown in Section A/A301, this designation does not apply. Please state the design load assumptions used for design of stairs and occupiable elevated framing. 9. S0.0 - LIVE LOADS: The live load listed for the canopy on Sheet S0.0 does not match the minimum live load required by 2018 IBC Table 1607.1. Given its size and structural steel construction, the canopy must be designed for a minimum of 20 psf roof live load. 10. S1.0 - MISSING BASE PLATE: On the Column / Anchor Plan, Column Type "S1" located adjacent to Grid 13/B is shown with no base plate. Confirm that this was the design intent and no base plate is required for this column. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/8/2024 3:35:28 PM 1. Sheet S2.5 (Ship's Ladder Details):The treads of the ship's ladder do not meet the minimum tread depths plus nosing projection. Provide properly sized treads in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1011.15.2. 2. Sheet A121 (Roof Plan): Roof drainage sizing calculations have not been provided. Provide roof drain sizing calculations to the roof plan in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.1 & 1106.2 and Tucson Amendment Appendix B rates of rainfall. 3. Sheet A121 (Roof Plan): GPM discharge amounts have not been provided for the roof/drain overflows. Provide the roof/drain overflows in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.2. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/12/2024 10:28:37 PM 1. General - Provide Ventilation Calculation Schedule - 2018 IMC Table 403.3.1.1 Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 2/13/2024 1:12:40 PM Electrical Review of Car Wash By: Ron Ross PE E504 VACUUM CONTROLLER SCHEMATIC: Sheet name is SIC Wiring Schematic. EP101 FIRST FLOOR POWER PLAN: Could not locate Keynote 21 ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN: Missing Keynote 8 and Missing Keynote 9 description. LV102 LOW VOLTAGE AUDIO PLAN: Missing Keynote 4. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/18/2024 11:55:29 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Add Square foot And Gpm loads that each roof drain is responsible for on details 4 & 6 on plan page P201 - 2018 IPC 1106.2 2). add secondary scupper size to plan page P201 detail 6 -2018 IPC 1108.3 3). add down spout & gutter sizes to plan page along GPM loads to plan page A121 -2018 IPC 1106.3, 1106.6 4). Add gas riser diagram to plan page P301 for clarity -2018 IFGC 106.3.1 |
||
| 02/27/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment | ||
| 02/26/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0124-00168 - TD-DEV-0823-00355 2620 E DREXEL RD. – P-I Tommy Car Wash (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 26, 2024 DUE DATE: March 4, 2024 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the P-I zone (UDC 4.7.29). Automotive Minor is a allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-5), subject to Use Specific 4.9.13.E. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the development package (DP) and although it appears that the plans match until the DP is approved by all review agencies and the comment below is addressed Zoning cannot approve this building plan. 2. The building plans show “Actual Floor Area 5,494 sf” and the development package shows “5,315 S.F., clarify the difference. The plans should match. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/07/2024 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide the civil plan referenced on sheet P100 showing the location of the water meter, reduced pressure backflow assembly and the route of the water service to the building. Specify the material of construction for the water service pipe. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Provide the water demand calculations for the domestic water use plus the continuous supply demand for the car wash equipment. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2018. |
||
| 02/27/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/02/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |