Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.4
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00168
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/24/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/22/2024 10:49:14 AM 1. RESOLVED Sheet S2.5 (Ship's Ladder Details):The treads of the ship's ladder do not meet the minimum tread depths plus nosing projection. Provide properly sized treads in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1011.15.2. ◦ Note: Sheet S2.5 along with several other structural and "G" sheets are not populating. It only shows partial drawings or jus the seal of the registered design professional. 2. UNRESOLVED Sheet A121 (Roof Plan): Roof drainage sizing calculations have not been provided. Provide roof drain sizing calculations to the roof plan in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.1 & 1106.2 and Tucson Amendment Appendix B rates of rainfall. ◦ Note: Sheet P306, as referenced in the comment response letter, has not been provided for review. ◦ Note: 7/22/24: Sheet P306 as referenced still has not been provided. 3. UNRESOLVED Sheet A121 (Roof Plan): GPM discharge amounts have not been provided for the roof/drain overflows. Provide the roof/drain overflows in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.2. ◦ Note: Sheet Sheet P306, as referenced in the comment response letter, has not been provided for review. ◦ Note: 7/22/24: Sheet P306 as referenced still has not been provided. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/24/2024 12:39:59 PM 1. (UNRESOLVED) - General - Provide Ventilation Calculation Schedule - 2018 IMC Table 403.3.1.1 i. Plan Sheet MH601 - No Natural or Mechanical Ventilation noted on Plan Sheet MH601 - 2018 IMC Table 403.3.1.1 ii. Spoke with Joshua Drake (Architect of Record). We both researched the issue and found the wrong Mechanical plans had been submitted for both of the last resubmittals reviews.. He is going to submit the right plans. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 7/21/2024 5:13:39 PM Third Plumbing Review: All Comments remain, the added plan pages stated in response not included Unresolved-1). Add Square foot And Gpm loads that each roof drain is responsible for on details 4 & 6 on plan page P201. **The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated- 2018 IPC 1106.2 ** Unresolved-2). add secondary scupper size to plan page P201 detail 6 **The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated -2018 IPC 1108.3 Unresolved-3). add down spout & gutter sizes to plan page along GPM loads to plan page A121 **The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated --2018 IPC 1106.3, 1106.6 Unresolved-4). Add gas riser diagram to plan page P301 for clarity**The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated -2018 IFGC 106.3.1 |
||
| 08/19/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The building plans cannot be approved until the associated development package, TD-DEV-0823-00355, has been approved. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/16/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0124-00168 - TD-DEV-0823-00355 2620 E DREXEL RD. – P-I Tommy Car Wash (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 16, 2024 DUE DATE: August 18, 2024 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the P-I zone (UDC 4.7.29). Automotive Minor is a allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-5), subject to Use Specific 4.9.13.E. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the development package (DP) and although it appears that the plans match until the DP is approved by all review agencies and the comment below is addressed Zoning cannot approve this building plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/19/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |