Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00168
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 05/09/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/18/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/12/2024 2:56:33 PM Due to an error with the submitted file "CONS-3_P480 Tucson - Permit Set_v3.pdf" revised construction drawings by RBI Structures could not be reviewed. The comments below were previously submitted on February 16, 2024. 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. RESOLVED 3. RESOLVED 4. S001 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Specialty engineer RBI Structures has specified that the cast-in-place concrete slab and foundation shall have a minimum 28-day concrete compressive strength of 4 ksi (Refer to Sheet S0.0). This conflicts with the compressive design called out on the structural general notes, Sheet S001. Please confirm which note controls. If the foundation is determined to be 3 ksi concrete, please confirm that the anchorage of all embedded and post-installed anchors specified by "Tommy" are still sufficient. 5. RESOLVED 6. RESOLVED 7. S0.0 - SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA: The structural general notes by RBI Structures provide design criteria for seismic loading that appears incorrect. Please verify the values for seismic ground accelerations Ss and S1, and express these values in units of "g". [Clarification: Response Letter confirms that seismic ground accelerations shall be per the Structural Calculations, Pg. 3, 4, 10 and 16. Structural general notes on Sheet S0.0 should be revised to show Ss = 0.268 g and S1 = 0.083 g OR Ss = 26.8% g and S1 = 8.30% g to match the calculations.] 8. RESOLVED 9. S0.0 - LIVE LOADS: The live load listed for the canopy on Sheet S0.0 does not match the minimum live load required by 2018 IBC Table 1607.1. Given its size and structural steel construction, the canopy must be designed for a minimum of 20 psf roof live load. [Clarification: Response Letter and Revised Calculations confirm that the canopy framing has been designed for 20 psf live load. Please update the structural general notes on Sheet S0.0 to match the calculation package.] 10. RESOLVED Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/11/2024 10:51:52 AM 1. Sheet S2.5 (Ship's Ladder Details):The treads of the ship's ladder do not meet the minimum tread depths plus nosing projection. Provide properly sized treads in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1011.15.2. UNRESOLVED ◦ Note: Sheet S2.5 along with several other structural and "G" sheets are not populating. It only shows partial drawings or jus the seal of the registered design professional. 2. Sheet A121 (Roof Plan): Roof drainage sizing calculations have not been provided. Provide roof drain sizing calculations to the roof plan in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.1 & 1106.2 and Tucson Amendment Appendix B rates of rainfall. UNRESOLVED ◦ Note: Sheet Sheet P306, as referenced in the comment response letter, has not been provided for review. 3. Sheet A121 (Roof Plan): GPM discharge amounts have not been provided for the roof/drain overflows. Provide the roof/drain overflows in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.2. UNRESOLVED ◦ Note: Sheet Sheet P306, as referenced in the comment response letter, has not been provided for review. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/9/2024 4:11:02 PM 1. (UNRESOLVED) - General - Provide Ventilation Calculation Schedule - 2018 IMC Table 403.3.1.1 i. Plan Sheet MH601 - No Natural or Mechanical Ventilation noted on Plan Sheet MH601 - 2018 IMC Table 403.3.1.1 Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 2/13/2024 1:12:40 PM Electrical Review of Car Wash By: Ron Ross PE E504 VACUUM CONTROLLER SCHEMATIC: Sheet name is SIC Wiring Schematic. EP101 FIRST FLOOR POWER PLAN: Could not locate Keynote 21 ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN: Missing Keynote 8 and Missing Keynote 9 description. LV102 LOW VOLTAGE AUDIO PLAN: Missing Keynote 4. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/14/2024 3:46:10 PM Second Plumbing Review: Unresolved-1). Add Square foot And Gpm loads that each roof drain is responsible for on details 4 & 6 on plan page P201. **The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated- 2018 IPC 1106.2 ** Unresolved-2). add secondary scupper size to plan page P201 detail 6 **The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated -2018 IPC 1108.3 Unresolved-3). add down spout & gutter sizes to plan page along GPM loads to plan page A121 **The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated --2018 IPC 1106.3, 1106.6 Unresolved-4). Add gas riser diagram to plan page P301 for clarity**The added plan pages stated in response comments were not part of the plumbing pages as stated -2018 IFGC 106.3.1 |
||
| 05/08/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The building plans cannot be approved until the associated development package, TD-DEV-0823-00355, has been approved. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/09/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0124-00168 2620 E DREXEL RD. – P-I Tommy Car Wash (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 09, 2024 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the P-I zone (UDC 4.7.29). Automotive Minor is a allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-5), subject to Use Specific 4.9.13.E. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the development package (DP), TD-DEV-0823-00355, and although it appears that the plans match until the DP is approved by all review agencies and the comment below is addressed Zoning cannot approve this building plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 04/09/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |