Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00148
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2024 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 03/04/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 02/23/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/04/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/12/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/11/2024 12:07:48 PM 1. GENERAL - MECHANICAL UNITS: Mechanical Plan M1.13B reference new equipment on the roof. New units range from 800 to 2,500 lb each per the schedule on M2.01B. Because these units are in excess of 300 lb, documentation by a licensed structural engineer is recommended to verify that the roof framing has adequate capacity to support these units. Please provide a letter, signed and sealed letter by a structural engineer licensed in the state of Arizona, that states that the existing roof framing has been evaluated and is sufficient to support the new mechanical loading. All structural evaluation shall be in conformance with the 2018 International Building Code and include the minimum design loads prescribed in ASCE 7-16. In lieu of a sealed letter, the applicant may submit complete structural shell drawings of the existing building, sealed by a professional engineer, for consideration by the Building Official. Shell drawings must clearly indicate the design loads used in the original design of the roof, and these loads should meet or exceed the minimum requirements outlined in the 2018 IBC, the ASCE 7-16 and the proposed mechanical loads as submitted by PKMR Engineers. Building(B) Reviewer Keith Miller kmiller@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/1/2024 1:11:20 PM 1. General: Provide the accessibility details for the toilet room fixtures, drinking fountains, sinks, maneuvering clearances, clear floor spaces, etc. meeting the requirements of the 2009 ICC A117.1. 2. General: Provide the drawings, specification sheets, and installation instructions for the factory equipment and charging stations. (2018 IBC section 107) 3. Sheet A0.0: Include the area of the proposed tenant build-out space in the project description and code review sections. (2018 IBC section 107) 4. Sheets A2.1 and DMEP.1B: Clarify the new vs existing rooms and equipment. The toilet rooms and drinking fountains are shown as existing on sheet A2.1 but are not shown on the floor plans on sheet DMEP.1B and other MEP drawings. Please coordinate and revise all affected sheets. (2018 IBC section 107) 5. Sheets A2.1, A2.2, A4.1: Include the wall, ceiling, and door insulation values for the thermal envelope meeting the requirements of the 2018 IECC section C402. 6. Sheet E1.13B: Show the locations of the new and existing emergency lights along the means of egress travel path. (2018 IBC section 1008.3) Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/8/2024 2:18:41 PM 1. General - Provide Ventilation Calculation/Schedule - 2018 IMC Section Table 403.3.1.1 Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 1/30/2024 1:39:37 PM Electrical Review of Tucson Commerce Center By: Ron Ross PE DMEP.1B Overall MEP Plan - Demolition: Could not locate Keyed Notes 3, 4, and 5. E2.13B Overall / Enlarged Plan - Power: Could not locate Keyed Note 6. E3.01B Electrical Schedules: RTU-3 and RTU-4 have undersized circuit breakers and conductors for the loads shown in Panelboard schedule. Should correct loads shown as Mechanical sheet M2.01B does show 70 amp Circuit breakers as correct. Should confirm, coordinate, and correct for IFC set. If 70 amp Circuit Breakers need to be upsized, resubmit with properly sized conductors. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/11/2024 9:11:44 AM First Plumbing Review: 1). Need to address Bldg. plan review Comment 1 -2018 IPC 404.2 |
||
| 02/20/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/26/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |