Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00039
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | BLDGS 1-6 ON SAME SET OF PLANS WITH MASTER SET OF PLANS ON BLDG 1 - TC-COM-0124-00029. | ||
| 01/10/2024 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | BLDGS 1-6 ON SAME SET OF PLANS WITH MASTER SET OF PLANS ON BLDG 1 - TC-COM-0124-00029. | ||
| 02/06/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | BLDGS 1-6 ON SAME SET OF PLANS WITH MASTER SET OF PLANS ON BLDG 1 - TC-COM-0124-00029. | ||
| 02/06/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | BLDGS 1-6 ON SAME SET OF PLANS WITH MASTER SET OF PLANS ON BLDG 1 - TC-COM-0124-00029. | ||
| 01/25/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/24/2024 9:46:48 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. S1.1 - CURRENT CODE: The currently adopted building code for the City of Tucson is the 2018 International Building Code. Please update the Structural Concrete and Reinforcing Steel general notes to comply with this code and its auxiliary codes, including the ACI 318-14. 3. S1.2 - HOLD DOWN SCHEDULE: Please confirm the typical post size called out in the Holdown Schedule on Sheet S1.2. The schedule calls for a C42.5x16 gage post, which is not a standard size. Please confirm and provide a detail for a custom size if required. 4. S1.2 - MASONRY WALL SCHEDULE: The Masonry Wall schedule on Sheet S1.2 does not indicate a typical wall thickness for masonry wall types "MW1" and "MW2". Please confirm where this information has been provided on the construction documents. 5. S2.3 - MISSING INFORMATION: Building 1, 3rd Floor Framing Plan shows framing members or straps extending 10'- 0" from the CMU cores that are not labeled. Please indicate the size and nature of these members and provide a detail if required to show how they are being fastened to the floors and walls. 6. S2.5 - MISSING INFORMATION: Building 2, Roof Framing shows x-braces reinforcing the roof diaphragm at either end of the building. Details "316" thru "319" identify this bracing as "cross brace straps per plan", however, reviewer could not find any callouts on plan. Please provide a minimum size for x-bracing at all locations. 7. S2.5 - MISSING INFORMATION: Building 2, Roof Framing is missing callouts identifying the ledgers to be installed at the masonry walls (Refer to Details "314" and "315".) Please provide a minimum ledger size and fastener size and spacing at all locations. 8. S3.1 - MISSING INFORMATION: Building 1, Roof Framing shows framing members or strapping south of the canopy framing along Grid 110 that is not labeled. Please indicate the size and shape of these framing members. 9. S3.2 - MISSING INFORMATION: Building 3, Roof Framing shows x-braces reinforcing the roof diaphragm at multiple locations that is not labeled. Please provide a minimum size for x-bracing at all locations. 10. S3.2 - MISSING INFORMATION: Building 3, Roof Framing is missing callouts identifying the ledgers to be installed at the masonry walls (Refer to Details "314" and "315".) Please provide a minimum ledger size and fastener size and spacing at all locations. 11. S4.1 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Detail "103" is cut at multiple locations on Sheets S2.8 and S2.9 through Wall Type "W5". However, this detail conflicts with the Wall Schedule on S1.2 regarding typical sill plate anchorage. Please confirm which note controls and revise. 12. S4.1 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Detail "108" is cut at multiple locations on Sheets S2.5, S2.6, S2.7, S2.8 and S2.9 through Wall Type "W6". However, this detail conflicts with the Wall Schedule on S1.2 regarding typical sill plate anchorage. Please confirm which note controls and revise. 13. S4.2 - CONFIRM DESIGN: Please verify the maximum vertical reinforcement spacing called out in Detail "136". Detail shows an 8'-0" CMU site wall retaining 2'-0" maximum of soil. By inspection, this wall is taller than similar Detail "135" and has a larger concrete footing, but has reduced area of steel. Please confirm and resubmit if required. 14. S5.1 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Detail "216" is cut at multiple locations on plan on Sheet S2.2. The detail calls out Ledger Type "L2", which conflicts at some locations with framing Plan Note 14. Please confirm which note controls and resubmit. 15. S5.2 - MISSING INFORMATION: Details "231", "233", "334" and "335" call for plywood sheathing or Densglass to be applied to exterior walls. If plywood sheathing is required at select locations, please provide additional information, including sheathing thickness, fastener size and spacing. 16. S5.3 - CONFIRM DESIGN: Detail "242", Note 5 calls out fasteners typical to steel-to-steel connections. Please confirm that #10 screws may be used to fasten a cold-formed steel track to a CMU wall, and provide a maximum spacing. 17. S6.2 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Details "330" and "331" are cut at multiple locations on Sheet S3.1 through Ledger "L1" at CMU walls. However, this detail conflicts with the Ledger Schedule on S1.2 regarding typical ledger size and fastener size and spacing. Please confirm which notes control and revise. 18. S6.2 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Details "334" and "353" are cut at multiple locations on Sheet S3.1 through Ledger "L3" at W1 walls. However, this detail does not show a ledger, and instead shows canopy roof joists attached directly to wall studs. Please confirm the design at these locations, as "W1" wall stud spacing does not match the typical roof joist spacing (2'-0" oc vs 5'-0" oc). This note also applies to Typical Detail "324", where roof purlins are shown directly attached to wall studs at all locations apart from Wall Type "W4". 19. S6.3 - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Details "351" and "352" provide conflicting information on parapet brace sizes (2 1/2" pipe vs 3 1/2" pipe). Further, Detail "352" calls for a continuous L4x4x1/4 member parallel to the exterior wall and welded to the braces that does not appear in Detail "351". Please revise these details to be consistent and resubmit. 20. S7.1 - MISSING INFORMATION: Stair Framing Plan "401" calls for "steel ledgers" along stair landing perimeters and a "steel plate" supporting the landing deck. A ledger size (ie. "L1", "L2" per the Ledger Schedule) has not been provided. Please provide all design information pertaining to the stair landing deck and ledger support at CMU walls. Refer to Details "206", "207" and "4XX" for more information. 21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS - CONFLICTING INFORMATION: Please confirm the beam size on Sheet S3.1, Grid J. The structural calculation package, pages 14 & 17 of 303, calls for a W14x22 steel beam, while Sheet S3.1 calls out an 8" cold-formed steel beam ("B4"). Please revise Sheet S3.1 or resubmit calculations to support this smaller beam size. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/18/2024 5:05:41 PM 1. Sheet CD1: The occupant load calculations are incorrect for the first floor. The business area has not been included in the occupant load calculation. Include the business area in the occupant load calculation in accordance with Section 1004 and Table 1004.5 2. Sheet CD1: A minimum number of self-storage facilities are required to have mobility features. Provide a room matrix that shows the accessible unit calculations. Additionally, ensure that rooms are properly dispersed throughout the structure. Section 225.3 and 225.3.1 of the 2010 ADAAG. 3. Sheet CD2: A minimum number of self-storage facilities are required to have mobility features. Provide a room matrix that shows the accessible unit calculations for all buildings. Additionally, ensure that rooms are properly dispersed throughout the structure. Section 225.3 and 225.3.1 of the 2010 ADAAG. 4. Sheet CD2: The occupant load calculations are missing for buildings 2,3,5, and 6. Provide detailed occupant load calculations in accordance with Section 1004.5 and Table 1004.5 5. Sheet A2.3: The stair and elevator shaft enclosures are not indicated as being rated properly. Provide properly rated enclosures in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 713.4. 6. Sheet A2.3: The floor plans are not provided with wall type indicators or a wall schedule with associated details. Provide wall tags along with a wall schedule that provides all necessary rated listed assemblies or prescriptive fire resistance in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 703 or 721. 7. Sheet A2.4: The floor plans are not provided with wall type indicators or a wall schedule with associated details. Provide wall tags along with a wall schedule that provides all necessary rated listed assemblies or prescriptive fire resistance in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 703 or 721. 8. Sheet A2.5: The floor plans are not provided with wall type indicators or a wall schedule with associated details. Provide wall tags along with a wall schedule that provides all necessary rated listed assemblies or prescriptive fire resistance in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 703 or 721. 9. Sheet A2.6: The floor plans are not provided with wall type indicators or a wall schedule with associated details. Provide wall tags along with a wall schedule that provides all necessary rated listed assemblies or prescriptive fire resistance in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 703 or 721. 10. Sheet A2.7: The floor plans are not provided with wall type indicators or a wall schedule with associated details. Provide wall tags along with a wall schedule that provides all necessary rated listed assemblies or prescriptive fire resistance in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 703 or 721. 11. Sheet A7.1: Roof drainage sizing calculations have not been provided. Provide roof drain sizing calculations to the roof plan in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.1 & 1106.2 2018 IPC 1106.1 & 1106.2 & Tucson Amendment Appendix B rates of rainfall. 12. Sheet A7.1: GPM discharge amounts have not been provided for the roof/drain overflows. Provide the roof/drain overflows in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.2 Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 1/22/2024 12:14:11 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 1/15/2024 11:04:29 AM Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/24/2024 7:30:49 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Need to address Bldg. plan review comments 1, & 4, -2018 IPC 403.1 2). Plan pages A7.1 thru A7.3 need to include gutter & downspout sizes along with calculations. -2018 IPC 1106.3, 106.6 3). Plan Page P0.2 needs to include the accessible route with distances from the buildings to restrooms & drinking fountain. - 2018 IPC 403.3.1 , 403.3.3 |
||
| 01/12/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | BLDGS 1-6 ON SAME SET OF PLANS WITH MASTER SET OF PLANS ON BLDG 1 - TC-COM-0124-00029. | ||
| 01/08/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |