Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0123-00490
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/26/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0123-00490 GENERAL: ⦁ Provide written responses to all review comments. ⦁ Provide a complete plan set. ⦁ Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditinally Approved NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet A0.02: The occupant load calculations provided are incomplete and incorrect. The building code does not base the requirements for occupant load calculations on perspective employees on shift. Several of living spaces have not been included in the calculations. A space by space occupant location is required. Provide an accurate and complete occupant load calculation in accordance with Section 1004.3 and Tale 1004.5. NOTE: Proposed shift occupants is not a concept established by the IBC in regards of occupant load calculations, as policies and shifts may change over time. The foundation principles of occupant load calculations is founded in maximum simultaneous occupancy of the structure. This is the conservative approach the permits the deviation of policy and shifts. Any deviation from the prescriptive requirements of the building code is required to be approved by the building official. Provide documentation showing that this method of calculating the occupant load in this manner is approved by Juan Garcia, CBO. 1. Sheet A3.01: The doors of the dorms are not rated properly. Provide properly rated doors in accordance with Section 716 and Table 716.1(2). NOTE: The use of non-separated mix use does not exempt the rating of corridors. Table 1020.1 does permit the derating of the corridor walls to 1/2 hour when protected by a NFPA 13 sprinkler system. Table 716.1(2) indicates that when corridor walls are rated at 1/2 hour the corridor doors are still required to be rated for 20 minutes. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide smoke dampers at each point a duct penetrates a corridor wall sheet M2.01 (IMC2018,607.5.4) This is a R-2 occupancy and smoke dampers are required at corridor penetrations, the code section that is cited is specific to corridor walls and has nothing to do with the section you are referring to in the IBC 2018,714.4.1 exception 2 for horizontal penetrations of fire rated floors Not Complied 2. Provide 120 cfm of exhaust to each of the toilet/shower room's #135,134,130 &129 sheet M2.01 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) Complied 3. Apparatus Bay shall be ventilated at .05 cfm continuously and either operate at all times at .75 cfm per square foot or provide automatic operation with CO and NO2 detectors set at 12 and 3 PPM respectively to operate at .75 per square foot upon activation of detectors sheet M3.01 (IMC2018,404.1) Complied 4. Show how you are bringing make up air when the exhaust fan for the kitchen hood is operating it must be interlocked with make up air at approximately the same air flow which is 1000 cfm's please be clear sheet M6.03 (IMC2018,508.1 A/C 5 is only bringing in 65 cfm of outside air and your saying the rest of make up is coming from the surrounding space is not sufficient the required make up must be interlocked to the KEF at approximately the same rate Not Complied ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved E2.1 LIGHTING PLAN: No description for Keynote #20 by SES panel. E3.2 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT POWER PLAN: Some equipment shows two disconnects and 2nd disconnect does not have any circuit information. Should clarify with explanation or remove where not required. E4.2 DISPATCH SYSTEM PLAN: Could not locate Fire Dispatch Key Note C. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Plumbing Review: **Comments 1,2,4,7,8 remain** 1). Same- Need to address Building Plan Review Comment #1 - IPC 403.1 **PENDING BUILDING REVIEW** 2). SAME-Trench drain piping system on plan page P3.2 needs at least 1 vent. -IPC 901.2., 915 REPLY TO RESPONSE-** EACH TRENCH DRAIN ON P3.2 IS TRAPPED AS REQUIRED BY IPC-1002.1, AND SHALL BE VENTED PER IPC901.2.1. THE INTERCEPTOR IS TO FAR AWAY TO BE CONSIDERED THE TRAP SEAL FOR THOSE DRAINS & THE INTERCEPTOR VENT IS SEPRATE FROM THE REQUIRED VENT FOR THE TRENCH DRAINS -IPC 1002.1 #3 & 1003.9** (SUGGEST VENT SYSTEM THAT COMPLIES EITH IPC SECTION 915) 3). OK -Gas Dryers on plan page P2.2 need make-up air method detailed. -IFGC 304 ** SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS** 4). SAME-Gas Radiant heaters on plan page P2.2 need their exhaust & combustion air methods illustrated. -IFGC 304, 503.1 ** NOTHING SHOWN IN MECHANICAL PAGES, PLEASE PROVIDE PAGE NUMBER** 5). OK- Is Gas BBQ on plan page P2.2 located beneath over hang, roof, or any type of over-head construction? if yes will need hood. -IFGC 305.1 ** SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS** 6).OK- S2 sink on plan pages P2.1 & P3.2 needs to discharge thru an grease interceptor -IPC 1003.1 ** SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS & UTILITY AUTHORITY** 7). SAME-Both washers on plan pages P2.1 & P3.2 need to discharge thru a lint interceptor- IPC 1003.6 REPLY TO RESPONSE ** IPC CODE 1003.6 #2 ALLOWS ONE RESIDENTIAL WASHER TO BEINSTALLED IN A COMMERCIAL SETTING WITH OUT A LINT INTERCEPTOR, THIS FACILITY HAS MULTIPLE. ( SUGGEST A FILTROL STYLE INTERCEPTOR) **TUCSON PLBG. AMENDMENTS DON'T ADDRESS THIS** 8). SAME- Public Business area with occupancy load of 28, needs 2 restrooms mens & womens -IPC 403.1, 403.2 update all affected pages. REPLY TO RESPONSE ** PLAN PAGE A0.01 STATES THE PUBLIC BUSINESS AREA HAS A LOAD OF 28, THAT WOULD REQUIERE A SEPRATE MENS & WOMENS RESTROOMS. THE EXCEPTION WOULD BE IF THIS AREA HAD A LOAD OF 25 OR LESS SEE IPC 403.2 #4. OR NOTATE ON PLANS ALL RESTROOMS AVAILBLE TO PUBLIC** If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/20/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment | ||
| 04/20/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0123-00490 5580 S NOGALES HY Zoning C-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plan for compliance with TD-DEV-0123-00109 and although it appears that the building plans match the DP Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved by all review agencies. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 04/20/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/12/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |