Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: BUILDING OFFICIAL APPEAL REVIEW v.3
Plan Number - TC-BCA-0425-00021
Review Name: BUILDING OFFICIAL APPEAL REVIEW v.3
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Building Official Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Building Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ** The rationale for the appeal appears to be exactly the same as the previous submittal. Please provide a letter with the changes identified. Neither the operable windows nor the high ceilings be equivalent to the required exhaust fan.** 1. The following is my research and recommendation as the Building Official will make the final decision. Since the Art Room is specifically required to provide exhaust at a rate of 0.7 CFM/SQFT because these spaces often generate airborne contaminants like dust, fumes, vapors, and odors from various artistic processes. These contaminants can be harmful to health and create an undesirable indoor environment. Exhaust systems remove these contaminants, ensuring a healthier and more comfortable environment for the occupants. Even those it is stated the instructor would only use non-toxic art materials; a code compliant exhaust system would ensure acceptable indoor air quality in all instances. Based on this information the appeal, as presented, does not appear to meet the intent of the code. Approval is not recommended in this case. Mark Masek Plans Examiner – Building Safety Planning and Development Services | City of Tucson main 520.837.4994 email mark.masek@tucsonaz.gov |