Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - T22PRE0244
Review Name: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fire hydrants shall be located within 400 ft of new structures. IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1 and also in accordance with IFC Appendix D. Please show new and existing fire hydrant locations on the plans and or fire sprinklers shall be installed. Building shall be within 600' of a fire hydrant. Unsure what fire service for filling hydrant is. Please clarify. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | 1. Balanced Basin Detention– show that you are limiting discharges of stormwater to predevelopment levels. 2. First Flush Retention - show that you are retaining the first 1/2" of stormwater on site and maximize water harvesting by directing runoff in all landscaping 3. This development will require a drainage report, SWPPP, and DEQ Dust Permit. 4. Please show the 14'x40' clear zone in front of each trash enclosure. 5. Please show sight triangles in the development package. Faffs Riederer faffs.riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: FIRE STATION 14 ACTIVITY NO. T22PRE0244 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 5580 S NOGALES HY/137-01-007U ZONING: C-2, R-2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. The NPPO is intended to encourage preservation in place of healthy native plants through sensitive site design that minimizes the disruption of areas within the site containing plants while allowing for salvage and transplantation of plants on the site that are likely to survive. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. 2. A landscape plan is required per 7.6.2.B.1-a. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development to submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4 and Administrative Manual 2-10. 3. Ensure the required number of trees is in all vehicular parking areas (1 tree: 6-8 parking spaces) per UDC 7.6.4.B.1. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible (TSM 5-01.3.2), and the requirement is 1 tree per 6-8 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to provide shade on asphalt. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 4. A street landscape border is required on S Nogales HWY. Per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1 5. One canopy tree is required every 33 linear feet in the landscape border. UDC 7.6.4C-1.a 6. Street landscape borders must be a minimum of 10’ wide as measured from the street property line. UDC 7.6.4.2.a 7. Street landscape borders must be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. UDC 7.6.4.2.d 8. 50% or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. UDC 7.6.4.e 9. All landscape plans shall incorporate water conserving design as defined in UDC Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual 5.01-5.11. 10. The Landscape Plan should match the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan as well as the Grading Plan. Landscape plan must have spot elevations in the detention/retention areas as well as in all water harvesting areas in the Landscape Plan. 11. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required per UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.3.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provides critical basin detention and first flush retention for all new development and impervious area. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With CoT edits to the manual are found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
|||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Samuel Rogers, Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting – T22PRE0244 Address: Not Assigned Parcel(s): 13701007B (land division proposed) Zoning: R-2 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Protective Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. Protective Service is an allowed use in the R-2 zone and is subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.13.F 3. UDC 4.9.13.F: In addition to the requirements of Section 7.6.5, Screening Standards, there shall be a screen wall at least five feet in height between this use and any residential zone 4. This development appears to be on a proposed new lot. The land division process must be approved prior to the issuance of any Development Package (DP). 5. Per the Exceptions to R-2 Zone’s Dimensional Standards, the minimum lot size for Protective Service is 20,000 sf, when configuring the new lot ensure that this minimum lot size is met. 6. S Nogales HY is a Major Street and Route and is proposed to be 120’ wide with 60’ measured from the road’s centerline on each sides of the street. It appears additional Right of Way will need to be taken from this property. 7. Properties on a Major Street and Route need to comply with developing area setback/perimeter yard requirements (https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-5192). S Nogales HY appears to have an ADT of 1000 or greater, so 21 will be required measured from the back of the future curb location. 8. Per the Exceptions to R-2 Zone’s Dimensional Standards, the maximum lot coverage is 60%, provide a lot coverage calculation on the DP submittal. (https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-4944) 9. The maximum height in the R-2 Zone is 25’ and parapet walls may exceed the maximum height by 4’. 10. Parking is required at 1 space/300 SF of GFA, with a build size of 13,914 SF 46 parking spaces will be required. An Individual Parking Plan (IPP) may be utilized to reduce this parking requirement. You can reach out to Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for more information on the IPP process. 11. Short-Term bike parking is required at 1 space per 8,000 sq. ft. GFA, with a minimum requirement of 2 spaces. 12. Long-Term bike parking is required at 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA, with a minimum requirement of 2 space. 13. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at Samuel.Rogers@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-6932. |
|||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | T22PRE0244 Comments: 1. Any existing curb, or sidewalk that is non-compliant will be reconstructed to meet current standards. 2. New curb returns are to have a 25 Ft. radius. (Minimum.) 3. New curb access ramps to be constructed at each curb return, per P.A.G. standard 207. 4. New concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. 5. New sidewalk shall be 6 Ft wide, per P.A.G. standard 200. 6. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk in the ROW. 7. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 8. Tie-in New sidewalk to existing per P.A.G. standard 203. 9. Maximum curb-cut width 35 Ft. (at entryways.) 10. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 11. Provide sight visibility triangles at both entrances. 12. Protect in place existing streetlights. 13. Protect in place existing catch basins. 14. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs. 15. For additional information contact an inspector for an onsite precon. 520-791-5100 David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| TW Hydraulic Modeling Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | 1. Tucson Water has no objections to the proposed development. 2. The above comments are based on the limited preliminary information provided by the applicant and should not be construed as a complete review of the proposal. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |