Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - T22CM07489
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2022 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 10/28/2022 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 11/22/2022 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/22/2022 | External Reviewers - Willdan | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: T22CM07489 GENERAL: ⦁ Provide written responses to all review comments. ⦁ Provide a complete plan set. ⦁ Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Denied Sheet 1; Site Plan setbacks subject to Tucson review and approval. DMA Sheet 2, 2018 IRC Sec 602.10; Provide sheer wall and portal wall details. DMA Sheet 2, 2018 IRC N1101.5; List requirements in accordance with this section on plans. DMA 4.Mechanical system design criteria. 5.Mechanical and service water heating systems and equipment types, sizes and efficiencies. 6.Equipment and system controls. 7.Duct sealing, duct and pipe insulation and location. 8.Air sealing details. Sheet 3, 2018 IRC R401.4.1 Geotechnical evaluation. In lieu of a complete geotechnical evaluation, the load-bearing values in Table R401.4.1 shall be assumed. Provide assumed value. DMA Sheet 3, 2018 IRC, R404.1.3.2.2; Concrete foundation stem walls supporting lightframe above-grade walls. Concrete foundation stem walls that support light-frame above-grade walls shall be designed and constructed in accordance with this section. 1.Stem walls not laterally supported at top. Concrete stem walls that are not monolithic with slabs-on-ground or are not otherwise laterally supported by slabs-on-ground and retain 48 inches (1219 mm) or less of unbalanced fill, measured from the top of the wall, shall be constructed in accordance with Section R404.1.3. Foundation stem walls that retain more than 48 inches (1219 mm) of unbalanced fill, measured from the top of the wall, shall be designed in accordance with Sections R404.1.1 and R404.4. DMA Sheet 3, 2018 IRC R318.1 Subterranean termite control methods. In areas subject to damage from termites as indicated by Table R301.2(1), protection shall be by one, or a combination, of the methods found within this section. Indicate on plans. DMA Sheet 4, 2018 IRC Tucson Amendment Section R802.11.1 Uplift resistance. REVISE Section by DELETING Section in its entirety and ADDING the following: Uplift resistance to minimize microburst effects shall be determined by either method 1 or 2 below: 1. Design-based wind uplift criteria Wind uplift requirements shall be determined by using the design wind value of 115 mph within Table R802.11 for the continuous load path transmitting the uplift forces from the rafter or truss ties to the foundation. 2. Prescriptive-based wind uplift criteria (Please note that the requirements of this Section are in addition to those required for the structural connection of wood members). 2.1. Conventionally-framed wood or cold-formed steel structures All bearing wall vertical connections shall be clipped with either approved structural sheathing or approved clips to provide a continuous load path from the joist or truss through the ledger or top plate to the bottom wall plate. Where clips are used, they shall be minimum Simpson H2.5 (A34 at ledger), or equivalent load capacity, of configuration to match connection and spaced at intervals not to exceed 24". At openings, lower cripple studs do not require clipping but king/trimmer studs require double clips at bottom and upper cripples require both full clipping to header as well as header to king stud. All platform framing requires either strapping listed for the purpose or continuous sheathing over rim joist from stud to stud vertically at each floor level. All non-bearing exterior walls shall be clipped as above except that the spacing may be extended not to exceed every other stud. DMA Sheet 4, 2018 IRC Ch 6; Verify if Glue Lam Beams are to be used and conformance to the prescriptive methods within this chapter. DMA Sheet 4, 2018 IRC R602.7.1 Single member headers. Provide details of box headers and materials used. DMA Sheet 4; Coordinate and must be consistent with design proposed on sheet 3. DMA Sheet 5; Engineered roof system. Identify as deferred item on cover sheet. DMA Sheet 5; Details indicate a turned down type of footings. This is not consistent with a stem type system shown on Sheet 3 of the plans. DMA Sheet 7, 2018 IRC Tucson Amend. Section M1411.3 Condensate disposal. REVISE Section by ADDING the following at the end of the paragraph: Condensate disposal shall be allowed to terminate as follows: 1. Into an approved fixture tailpiece, funnel drain, waste air gap fitting, floor sink, slop sink {A0216551.docx/} Page 4 of 6 2018 International Residential Code Amendments and laundry tray. 2. At or below grade outside the building in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. 3. Over roof drains or gutters or downspouts that connect to drainage pipes, provided they terminate at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. DMA. If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/28/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Wyatt Berger Planner PROJECT: T22CM07488 and T22CM07489 1004-1008 E Silver St - R-3 Two homes on one lot (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 11, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. The legal description of Lot A on S22-035 has a lot size of 9,261 square feet. Show the correct lot size of Lot A on the submitted plans. 2. Per paving plan U-2014-001, a typical section shows 16 feet between the centerline of Park Avenue and the edge of the bicycle lane. The distance shown the submitted plans between the edge of the bicycle lane and the west property line is 15 feet; the correct distance per the paving plan's typical section should be 14 feet. Provide the correct distance with your next submission. 3. Per paving plan I-515, the distance between the face of curb on Silver Street and the property line is 18 feet. The distance shown on the submitted plans is 15 feet. Provide the correct distance with your next submission. 4. Provide a complete plan set showing elevations and a floor plan of each proposed dwelling unit. The proposed construction follows the motor vehicle parking requirements for multifamily dwellings (0-70 units/acre) (UDC Table 7.4.4-1). Per UDC 7.4.6 and a Zoning Administrator's determination, when five (5) or more motor vehicle parking spaces are required, the requirements of UDC 7.4.6 and 7.6.4.B apply. Commercial parking standards ultimately apply if six or more bedrooms are proposed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Wyatt Berger at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. |