Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Permit Number - T22CM06999
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2022 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/28/2022 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Roof projections extending into the 3-foot fire separation distance to the neighboring property line require not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction on the underside, R302.1 (City of Tucson Amended). The fire protected overhang may not extend closer than 24” from the property line. 13. A roof overhang may not extend closer than 24” to the neighboring property line. Any part of a roof projection extending into the 3-foot fire separation distance from the property line requires not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction on the underside, R302.1 (City of Tucson Amended). |
||
| 11/29/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ShapeShape FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM06999 5727 E Camino Del Apadrinar - R-1 RCP New SFR (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: November 29, 2022 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.1). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. This comment was not addressed. Nowhere on the approved tentative plat does it show a 20’ street setback. The front street perimeter yard setback is not correct and for the main dwelling should be listed as 21’ or the height of the H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two as measured from the from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane, UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. The street perimeter yard setback to the garage should be listed as A minimum setback of 19 feet from the back of sidewalk UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b.(1). This comment was not addressed. The side street perimeter yard setback is not correct and for the main dwelling should be listed as 21’ or the height of the H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two as measured from the from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane, UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. For this site the setback is measured from back of wedge curb as no parking is allowed along the east side of Avenda Santa Carina. This comment was not addressed. Provide a setback dimension from the proposed SFR to the north property line. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 11/28/2022 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |