Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - T22CM06636
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2022 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 12/06/2022 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 12/07/2022 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/29/2022 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Director's Decision pending upon payment of Historic review fees. And confirmation that plans have been revised to reflect conditions in Decision Letter. | ||
| 10/31/2022 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide a complete plan set showing 2018 IRC compliance. Process a Pima County request for an address assignment. | ||
| 10/27/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM06636 400 W Simpson St – HR-2 New ADU, Shade Structures, fence & Walls (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: September 12, 2022 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for Historic Review (UDC 5.8.8). This site is located in the HR-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence (SFR) with an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, 8, & 9 and 6.6.3. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). 1. Based on a post height of 10’-0” the required perimeter yard setback from the post supporting the fabric shade system to the west property line is 6’-8”, proposed setback is 0’-0”. 2. Based on a post height of 9’-2” the required perimeter yard setback from the post supporting the fabric shade system attached to the ADU to the south property line is 6’-2”, proposed setback is 0’-0”. 3. Based on a wall height of 8’-0” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed storage structure to the south property line is 6’-0”, proposed setback is 0’-0”. 4. As heights were not called out for the “MASONRY WALL” shown on the plan Zoning cannot determine if setbacks are an issue. 5. The minimum setback to a side street property line is ten (10) feet (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.1.b). Proposed side street setback from the proposed ADU is 0’-0” 6. New site fencing and retaining was are proposed. Historic review is required and must be approved prior to approval of this building plan. Historic application/requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Preservation/HPZ_Review_Application_Package_2020.pdf, and is a separate submittal from the building plans submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using Submission Type “Historic Review”. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |