Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Permit Number - T22CM06498
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/20/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
09/19/2023 | Commercial Mechanical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide ventilation calculations and show how mechanical ventilation will be provided for the building. Reference: Section R403.6 ECC 2018. 2. The current submittal calls for packaged heat pumps with a nominal cooling capacity of 2.5 tons. Show that a 2-ton capacity heat pump will not adequately condition the areas. [Second comment: The revised mechanical plan shows nine new heat pumps with a nominal cooling capacity of two tons but none of the heating and cooling load calculations support that capacity. In addition, a specification on the sheet calls for a heat pump with a 3-ton capacity.] [Initial comment: Justify the capacities of the specified heating and cooling equipment that far exceeds the submitted heating and cooling load calculations. Reference: Sections R302.2 and R403.7, IECC 2018 as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
||
09/19/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The revised detail now shows the cold water supply labeled as hot water. [Second comment: The new detail, A/P-1, appears to show the cold water supply and the hot water supply labels interchanged. Verify the design.] [Initial comment: Clarify the hot water system. Seven tankless water heaters are shown in the laundry room, apparently piped in parallel, but a note located in the community eating space calls out a 40-gallon water heater. If the tankless water heaters are to be used, provide a specification for the units and a detail showing how they are to be plumbed. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] | ||
09/25/2023 | External Reviewers - Willdan | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Sheet 1 of 12: Provide an itemized letter that responds to all plan review comments. Provide correlated clouds and deltas for all corrections made to the plans. Once resubmitted a complete re-review can be performed. DMA OUTSTANDING COMMENT: Plans are also not signed and sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Sheet 1 of 12: Plan set does not include existing building data, this includes but not limited to; code correct occupancy classifications and correct type of construction, stories, total height, Fire sprinkler, Fire Alarm, etc. NOTE: This was requested on 1st review also. Plans also do not include corresponding structural details to the provided structural calculations. DMA OUTSTANDING COMMENT: Provide accurate type of construction and specific sprinkler information and Building Data, include but not limited to occupant loads. Sheet 1 of 12; Combine Structural calculations in one document and document must signed and sealed by an Arizona Registrant (engineer). DMA OUTSTANDING COMMENT: Not submitted with re-submittal. Sheet 1 of 12, 2018 IBC 107.2.1, 107.2.3; The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, size and character of all portions of the means of egress including the path of the exit discharge to the public way in compliance with the provisions of this code. In other than occupancies inGroups R-2, R-3, and I-1, the construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces. Provide a complete means of egress plan. DMA OUTSTANDING COMMENT: Occupancy proposed as R-2. Recommend a project narrative be submitted that includes the function of the space. Sheet 1 of 12, 2018 IBC [A]1 07.2.6Site plan. The construction documents submitted with the application for permit shall be accompanied by a site plan showing to scale the size and location of new construction and existing structures on the site, DISTANCES FROM LOT LINES (Table 602), and it shall be drawn in accordance with an accurate boundary line survey. In the case of demolition, the site plan shall show construction to be demolished and the location and size of existing structures and construction that are to remain on the site or plot. DMA Structure appears to be shown as 0 lot line with no fire separation distance. Design accordingly Sheet 2a Provide details for new walls and provide wall type legend. Verify all doors have a minimum 32 inch clear opening when opened 90 degrees. Provide light and ventilation calculations for each room. Provide exiting plan for each suite and over all building. Show emergency egress from each sleeping room. Show rooms with ADA Access and path of travel to the public way. Autumn Wollmann |Deputy Director Willdan Engineering |Comprehensive. Innovative. Trusted. 1440 E. Missouri Ave, Suite C170 | Phoenix, Arizona 85014 T. 480.787.5526 | F. 602.870-7601 |C. 480.404.8069 awollmann@willdan.com |
||
10/04/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resolve Willdan comments. Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov | ||
10/20/2023 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Historic comments were not addressed. Provide documents noted in the Historic & Special District informational handout (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf) and submit it under the Historic sub-record. | ||
10/17/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM06498 443 S Stone Ave – HC-3 Residential (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL: October 17, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. The following comments are relative to an application for Historic Review (UDC 5.8.8). This site is located in the HC-3 zone (UDC 4.7.22). 1. Until approved by Historic Zoning cannot approve. As it appears that you are replacing exterior doors Historic Review is required and must be approved prior to Zoning approval of this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
||
09/19/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |