Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - T21BU00498
Review Name: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2023 | Sign Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/08/2023 | Commercial Electrical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please address the electrical plan review comments and provide a written response. Per the Engineers letter dated Feb 9, 2023. The scope of work includes modifications of the Signs luminaires Ballasts and Fluorescent Lamps. 1 Any modification to the exterior lighting will require full compliance with the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. See section 104.1, 104.2, 501.4 2 Show all electrical work in detail on the construction plans. Including notes associated with the lighting. Ref; 2018 IBC section 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code |
||
| 05/08/2023 | Signs | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Below are comments on the authorized repair third resubmittal for COT ID# 592 at 10411 East Interstate 10 (T21BU00498). Sheet 1 of 2 No comments. Sheet 2 of 2 1. in Scope of Work, if ballasts are to be replaced, insert a paragraph in the appropriate location reflecting such replacements, identifying manufacturer and model numbers for both existing and new. 2. In the specifications box for the existing ballasts, if ballasts are not to be replaced, revise manufacturer and model number to reflect existing installation; 2/9/23 Engineer’s response letter indicates that ballasts are the same as installed under T10EL01797, but the ballasts shown on that plan are Philips Advance RS-2S100-FO (consistent with the existing rectangular cans w/o j-box fittings) and not the Universal WPR-480-X-LHR shown on current plan; further clarify why applicant believes there is no VHO weatherproof equivalent to the Universal WPR-480-X-LHR, such as the Universal WPR-931; both ballasts and lamps must be HO, not VHO. Sheet 3 of 3 1. In Detail A, if ballasts are to be replaced. revise the designation for the two ballasts as being replaced with new rather than being detached and reattached, referencing the ballast identifications on Sheet 2. |
||
| 05/10/2023 | Building Official | REVIEW COMPLETED |