Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: SPECIAL DISTRICTS REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - SD-0625-00098
Review Name: SPECIAL DISTRICTS REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design Review - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please address the following in the Design Package: 1. PDF Page 1: Delete the Special Districts application form. Our department does not use it anymore; 2. PDF Page 5: Delete the comment from Michael Taku, since it does not apply to this project. Instead, include comments received under TC-COM-0625-01128; 3. PDF Pages 6, 7 and 11: Include a north arrow; 4. Include a site plan, making sure to depict and dimension property lines, location of proposed planters, pedestrian clearance, the proposed awning, total gross floor area, and existing and proposed land uses; 5. PDF Page 15, Elevations: Dimension building heights from grade, and dimension the proposed awning; 6. PDF Page 17, Building Materials: Include the materials for the new awning; 7. Reach out to David Marhefka (David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov), landscape reviewer from DTM for the proposed trees on the sidewalk, incorporate his comments in the Design Package, and include a copy of your final communication with David. Thank you and please let me know if there are any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| Historic - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Additional items needed: window and door schedule noting dimensions, materials, operation. Comments: The proposed treatment of the west facade meets historic preservation standards - the sizes and locations of openings will not change, the proposed door and metal window treatments are appropriate, and there are no other proposed alterations to the facades. The front (north) facade was historically asymmetrical. The proposed alterations would change the opening sizes and configuration so as to make the front symmetrical. It also appears that the size of the bulkhead would change. Recommend revising plans to retain existing opening locations, sizes, and configuration. Recommend retaining/replacing front door system with something similar to existing in terms of design and configuration. Proposed metal material is an appropriate replacement. This project will require review by the Plans Review Subcommittee of the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission. Final Historic approval is determined by the PDSD Director. For questions about these comments, email desiree.aranda@tucsonaz.gov. | |||
| Special Districts Application Completeness Express | REQUIRES RESUBMIT |