Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: LAND DIVISION/SUBDIVISION v.3
Plan Number - S22-061
Review Name: LAND DIVISION/SUBDIVISION v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Services/JOC | APPROVED | S22-061 - Land Division_Subdivison v3 – 6131 E BENSON HY Tucson Water has no objections to the proposed subdivision plat. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Engineering | APPROVED | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 SUZANNE DROUBIE PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Karl Christensen GIS Analyst Pima County Assessor’s Office Karl.Christensen@pima.gov (520)724-3125 DATE: October 3, 2023 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding: (SUBMITTAL 3) S22-061 – FINAL PLAT – Arroyo at Los Reales, Lots 1-6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * _ Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. __X___ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: • While this is not something that I will deny acceptance of this plat for review on its own, and have not previously mentioned, it is noted that a number of the annotations and callouts in this plat are placed such that their text box cuts into or breaks linework. While addressing the other bullet points in this review, it would be nice to see these annotations moved so their text boxes no longer cut into or break linework. The reasoning is that scans at the Recorder’s Office are often of poor quality, and things like that can end up causing situations where ambiguity is introduced due to obscured/broken linework. • Not sure why CL17, CL18, & CL19 are all included for the same centerline curve. Please review. • Curve C11 and C12 have the same dimensional data in the curve table, but if they represent the two curve segments that make up that full curve, they should be different. If that curve dimensional information is actually for the full curve and not the segments, not sure why there are two different curve table entries for a single curve. Please review. • The road centerline line segment between curves CL21 and CL22 does not have dimensional data. • The Lot/ROW line segment between curves C9 and C13 does not have dimensional data. Also, please review the distance dimension for the centerline and opposite ROW line segments parallel to this same line, as currently they have different distances, which if true would violate the ROW offset from the centerline being a true 32’ offset. • The bearing for the centerline and South Lot/ROW line at the adjusted portion of Rincon Ridge Drive to the East of the subdivision has a different bearing than the North ROW line (also the South line of APN: 140-44-2470), which also violates the 32’ ROW offset. • The distance south of the centerline of Rincon Ridge Drive where it intersects the subdivision boundary to the East is shown as 32.00’, which appears to be in error. Please revise. • Please include dimensional data for where the centerline of Rincon Ridge Drive intersects Wilmot Rd; ie: distance to the Brass Cap to the North and/or BCSM to the South (similar to the dimensional information included for Los Reales Rd.). Also, the 23.60’ centerline line segment does not have a bearing. • Ownership information on plat no longer matches our records. As of the recordation of the deed at SQ: 20231740171 our records now show ownership by: ‘UTAH REAL ESTATE 1/3 & PM BLUE MOON INVESTMENTS LLC 1/3 INT & HORNE JULIE & JAYDEE FAMILY INTERVIVO REVOC TR 1/3 INT’. The plat still includes the previous 1/3 interest owners ‘MICHAEL SCOTT ANDERSON AND PATRICIA ANN RICHIE’ instead of ‘PM BLUE MOON INVESTMENTS LLC’. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. AUTOCAD DWGS CAN BE SENT TO THE EMAIL ABOVE. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The applicant is responsible for obtaining review and approval by Pima County, for projects involving RWRD sewers, on-site wastewater treatment facilities and public water systems. The applicant must provide an Approval letter from RWRD, prior to PDSD Approving the permit. | |||
| CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |