Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP22-0298
Parcel: 141367940

Address:
7401 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1

Permit Number - DP22-0298
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/07/2022 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
12/06/2022 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/06/2022 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT Comments:

Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into ore within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.



Section 912.2.1 Installation. Fire department connections shall be installed in accordance with the NFPA standard applicable to the system design and shall comply with Sections 912.2 through 912.7



Section D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater.



Section D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof.



Section D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet (4572 mm) and not greater than 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approve by the fire code official.



Questions:
Jennifer Peel-Davis
Tucson Fire Department
Fire Plans Examiner
Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
Desk: 520-837-7033
11/10/2022 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Encantada at La Estancia
ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0298
Address: 7401 S Wilmot Rd
Zoning: PAD-7
Existing Use: undisturbed
Proposed Use: Multi-family

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 10, 2022
DUE DATE: November 18, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
1. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized.
2. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes.
3. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf
COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf
4. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands.
5. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation.
a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible.
b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas.
c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas.
d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained.
e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations.
f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements.
6. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match.
7. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.
8. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes.
9. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable.
10. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g.
11. An interior landscape border on the east is required, see UDC table 7.6.4-1.
12. There is an unidentified detail 9/18 on sheet 15, lacking a leader line.
13. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.
14. Identify hatch at entries and squiggly line b/w bldgs. 6 & 7.
15. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g.
16. Move trees closer to asphalt or sidewalks to provide as much shade as possible.
17. The street landscape borders do not achieve the 50% groundcover/shrub requirement, please revise.
18. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards.
19. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1.
20. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A.
21. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways.
22. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific.
23. The number of native plants deemed viable is very low and will require a site visit for verification.
24. Please distinguish between the mitigation/salvage plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information on each landscape plan. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees.
25. Please identify the project monitor by name, phone, and address prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
11/28/2022 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. It is unclear in the drainage report how this proposed development is meeting the Retention/Detention requirements for both critical and balanced basin. The referenced drainage reports from the master drainage plan and other development plans either don't include this parcel or the developed conditions of this parcel as proposed. Clarify/Revise as necessary.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
11/14/2022 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT See NPPO comments
11/04/2022 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL



FROM: PDSD Zoning Review



PROJECT: Encantada @ La Estancia

Development Package (1st Review)

DP22-0298



TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 04, 2022



DUE DATE: November 18, 2022



COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.



This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).



Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 19, 2023.



CONTENT REQUIREMENTS



COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0298, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.



2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - As the “TEMPORARY MULTI-USE DRAINAGE ESMT” shown on the plan runs under Buildings 3 & 10 it will either need to be abandoned or modified prior to approval of this DP.



2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development

The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - It appears that the proposed development crosses over into the MDR & MHDR Development Areas to the east. Cleary define the development areas on the plan. If the proposed site encroaches into the MDR & MHDR Development Areas the area of encroachment is required to meet the development regulations for that area. Additional comments maybe forth coming.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension all back-up spurs shown on the plan, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of accessible spaces is not correct and should be 13.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The required number of short-term bicycle parking is not correct and should be 58.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The ratio used for the long-term bicycle parking is not correct and should be 0.5 not 0.05. This will change the number of required long-term bicycle spaces.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Until comment 3 is addressed perimeter yard setbacks cannot be verified.



COMMENT: Provide written documentation that the required design review has been completed/approved, see PAD-1 Section IV.B with the next submittal.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.



RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/03/2022 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED
10/31/2022 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
10/28/2022 OK to Submit - External Reviewer PC Addressing REVIEW COMPLETED
11/01/2022 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED