Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0295
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2022 | Fire New Construction | APPROVED | |||
| 10/31/2022 | OK to Submit - External Reviewer PC Addressing | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 11/07/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/07/2022 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The NPPO exception is not accepted, this project requires an NPPO | ||
| 11/03/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Clarify the purpose of this rough grading proposal, I don't see any final grading/development on this site in the system. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/07/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: South Central Industries ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0295 Address: 1949 E Valencia Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: none stated TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2022 DUE DATE: October 20, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 2. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g. 3. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific. 4. The NPPO is intended to encourage preservation in place of healthy native plants through sensitive site design that minimizes the disruption of areas within the site containing healthy plants while allowing for salvage and transplanting plants on the site that are likely to survive. 5. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted and approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. Please note that Mesquite hybrids will be considered native trees, and should be included in NPP inventory UDC 7.7.6. 6. Please distinguish between the mitigation/salvage plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees. 7. Please provide a summary of quantities of all inventoried, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans. 8. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 9. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/04/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Epiroc - Rough Grading Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0295 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 04, 2022 DUE DATE: October 20, 2022 The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the grading plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised grading plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 - Remove the old Development Package PDSD Approval stamp from sheets 4 – 8 as an electronic stamp will be affixed once the plan is approved. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0295, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 11/03/2022 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/31/2022 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 10/31/2022 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |