Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0290
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2022 | Historic | NOT REQUIRED | Property is listed individually on the National Register. It is not listed locally as an HPZ or HL. No Historic review required. | ||
| 12/14/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/21/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Project: DP22-0290 Comments: 1. Clarify whether previous IPP T21SA00145 will be followed 2. Ensure correct DP number DP22-0290 is labelled on plan 3. Please include pertinent information for both property owner and firm that prepared the geotechnical report on the cover sheet as per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 4. Show Waste stream calculation following guidelines in both TSM 8-01.8 and TC 15-10.1.E (45 gal/unit) 5. Delineate existing regulatory floodplain on plan 6. Ensure rezoning conditions are followed: An outdoor lighting plan and "no right turn" sign are required. Include a detail for the sign 7. Include callouts and keynote for the proposed curb cuts on the site plan 8. Include callout and keynote for proposed ADA ramp going off northwest side of parking lot 9. Include a detail for the ADA ramp going off northwest side of parking lot 10. Provide layout on site plan for 5ft wide sidewalk on east side of 7th per rezoning condition 5C and 12 Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/21/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Arsarco ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0290 Address: 11 E 7th St Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: Office Proposed Use: Multi-family TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 21, 2022 DUE DATE: November 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Please elaborate on why existing trees required removal, considering the historic nature of the neighborhood. 2. The hatches on the Water Harvesting Plan confilcit with each other. The green hatch has no description. It is not necessary to show plant canopy on plans, it is required for the calculations only. 3. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands. 4. The grading plan and water harvesting plan almost meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance, rezoning conditions, and technical standard. a. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. b. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. Ind 5. Demonstrate how condition #8c. is met by this design. 6. This comment wasn’t sufficiently addressed on civil plans – Clearly identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading/site and water harvesting plans. 7. Move the table of landscape calculations to the landscape plans, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 8. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g. 9. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/09/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 7th Avenue Lofts Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0290 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 09, 2022 DUE DATE: November 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 17, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0290, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 –Remove the reference to DP21-0107 from the plan as the DP has been withdrawn. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - The section corners shown on the location map are not correct. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 - The existing zoning shown under General Note 1 is not correct and should be O-3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 - As this site is being prepared in conjunction with a rezoning, C9-21-06, revise General note 1 to include proposed Zoning is C-2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 - The rezoning conditions listed on sheet 2 do not match the recommended conditions submitted with this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 - The submitted PDP and this plan do not match. Provide written documentation from the Rezoning Section that states a revision to PDP will not be required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - You provided case number T21SA00145 adjacent to the title block, clarify if you are going to use the IPP or not as your vehicle parking does not reflect the IPP> COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Remove General Note 13 as it does not apply to this site. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension from the two (2) vehicle parking spaces at the southeast end of the double row of parking in the center of the site, to the curb to the south. Thie PAAL is required to be 24’-0” wide, see UDC Figure 7.4.6-A and Table 7.4.36-1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation does not reflect the requirements of IPP case number T21SA00145 or the correct requirements of UDC Table 7.4.8-1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation shall provide the number of required & provided accessible vehicle parking spaces and the number of required and provide van accessible spaces. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - As the proposed short-term bicycle parking located near the southwest corner of Buildng A is located adjacent to require hand rails demonstrate on the plan or detail that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - The setback measurement, “FROM BACK OF EXISTING CURB (7TH AVE)” listed for the west street perimeter yard is not correct and should be measured from the street property line. By definition this site does not qualify for Developing Area Setbacks and the street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1. As you are not proposing any new building construction the existing building perimeter yard setbacks shall remain and no changes are required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a detail for the proposed accessible ramp shown near the southwest corner of Building A that demonstrates that all requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Sections 405 are met. It does not appear that Sections 405.7 or 405.8 are met. COMMENT: There is a Keynote 7 that points to the bottom of the accessible ramp shown near the southwest corner of Building A, but this area does not appear to be pavement. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 11/22/2022 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/14/2022 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments |