Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP22-0283
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/27/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The following comments were not addressed: 1. A sidewalk is required to connect the pedestrian access point of the building to N Benton Ave (TSM 7-01). Show that this sidewalk is vertically separated from the PAAL through use of a minimum 6" curb, bollard, railing, or other mean (TSM 7-01) 3. 90 degree parking is not allowed off of a PAAL less than 24' wide (UDC Table 7.4.6-1) 4. Show backup spur for southwestern spot with accordance to UDC 7.4.6 5. Show existing grading of asphalt, show how any pavement drainage flows are directed into landscaping to maximize water harvesting through use of curb cuts/scuppers. See landscaping comments on water harvesting Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/08/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | COMMENTS: 1. Show how new landscape border on N Benton is to be irrigated. Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-4988 |
||
| 03/08/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 990 N BENTON AV Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0283 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 8, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 11 , 2023 . SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; This comment is still applicable please provide a brief legal description on the title block. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Provide the information noted by the standard above in the title block. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Please provide the page numbers as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Once the Board of Adjustment has been approved please provide the case number as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C -- Please provide information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 -Label Benton Av as public as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a -Provide a detail for the ADA sign. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial structure within the footprint of the building(s). 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - provide the height and square footage within the footprint of the building as noted by the standard above. 8. The maximum height in the P zone per UDC table 6.3-6.A is 16ft, the proposed calculated height for the metal structure is 18’1” a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. Board of Adjustment requirements and application can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Zoning_Administration_Application_BA_fillable.pdf. Contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions about the Board of Adjustment. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - Show pedestrian circulation from the ADA spaces to the right of way ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 03/30/2023 | Zoning Modifications - Variance | REVIEW COMPLETED | Variance 1) Allow the metal garage to be constructed with an increased height from 16’ to 18’-2” as measured to the midpoint between the eave and ridge of the roof, all as shown on the submitted plans. Variance DENIED |