Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0277
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/18/2022 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 11/14/2022 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | NOT REQUIRED | Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review queue for DP22-0277. The project does not require review. | ||
| 12/21/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/09/2022 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Correct Keynote 34 on sheet C3:backwater valves are employed only on drain piping. A reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly is required at this location. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf | ||
| 10/31/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Comments: Show a complete pedestrian circulation path including out to the trash enclosure. Per TSM 7.4.1 B and C continue the sidewalk on the north end of the building to extend between the building and the parking spaces/PAAL next to the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure dimensions do not meet the standards in TSM section 8-01 and a TSMR approved by Environmental Services will be required. The parcel is along a Major Streets & Routes segment. Consult the Tucson Major Streets & Routes manual to find the correct future Right of Way and label it on the site plan. The 3.1' sidewalk shown along the entrance from Grant Rd does not meet the minimum 4' wide sidewalk requirement. As this plan is proposing to discharge concentrated overflow storm water through the retaining wall onto the neighboring parcel, provide documentation of acknowledgement and acceptance from the State of Arizona. Provide a structural analysis for the existing retaining wall showing it supports the proposed development with the added surcharges from the PAAL and parking along the top of the wall. Per the Retention/Detention Manual when underground detention is proposed the underground storage system shall provide 1.5 times the required 100-year detention volume. The additional 50% of the volume can be provided on the surface so that issues with improper drainage are observable. Per the Retention/Detention Manual for the underground retention proposed – Providing first flush retention underground is prohibited, without prior approval of the Floodplain Administrator. Follow water harvesting basin depth requirements (6”-9”) or provide documentation of gas line easement stormwater harvesting limitations. Clarify how water will enter the two smaller water harvesting basins west of the building. If water will enter via curb cut, grading must support. If water will enter via downspout and scupper, please label on the water harvesting plan and grading plan. Please show the maneuvering requirements – turning radius, clearance from adjacent parking, back up distance, safe access and operational area – for the environmental services trucks. (UDC 8-01.5.3) Faffs Riederer faffs.riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/27/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Casino Self Storage Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0277 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 20, 2022 DUE DATE: October 26, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 02, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0277, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards listed under General Note 5 are not correct. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-5 and provide the correct standards. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As modifications, IPP, TSMR, are proposed, once approved provide the case number(s) adjacent to the title block and complete the general notes to include the case numbers, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable conditions of approval. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Until the IPP is approved and required information provided Zoning cannot approve this DP. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. The details shall provide the space, width & depth and wheel stop location and the access aisle width for the required accessible space. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a setback dimension from the proposed building to the curb along the frontage road of I-10. Minimum setback is 21’ or the height of the building wall, greater of the 2. A Board of Adjustment for Variance maybe required. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSME) will need to be submitted and approved for the proposed 3.1’ sidewalk shown on the plan. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide sidewalk width dimensions for the sidewalk shown along the west side of the building. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 12. COMMENT: Provide a detail for the proposed security fence called out under Keynote 42 so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 10/27/2022 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | DP22-0277 Comments: 1. The existing curb, sidewalk and the driveway apron may remain if they are within current standards. 2. Any existing curb, sidewalk, curb access ramps or driveway aprons which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 3. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. 4. Concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200. 5. Concrete curb access ramp per P.A.G. standard 207. 6. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk in the ROW. 7. New driveway apron per P.A.G. standard 206. 8. Sidewalk from the onsite circulation path cannot tie directly into a driveway apron. 9. For further questions contact an inspector for an onsite precon. 520-791-5100 |
||
| 11/22/2022 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/21/2022 | Sun Tran Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sun Tran bus stop is east of the proposed driveway in this project. There shouldn't be any conflict. Except, maybe, during construction. Hopefully the TCP includes access to that bus stop. Thank you. Bea Paulus Bus Stop Program Coordinator Sun Tran 520-206-8826 bea.paulus@tucsonaz.gov |