Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0276
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2022 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 11/14/2022 | Fire New Construction | APPROVED | |||
| 11/14/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/09/2022 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing is returning DP22-0249 for corrections. Please see plan for comments. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 11/04/2022 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See landscape comments | ||
| 10/28/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | (The review comments below are from the OK to Submit.) 1. The site is located in a Zone X FEMA floodplain and each building will require a floodplain use permit unless a watershed study proving the property is unaffected by 100-year floods is provided. 2. Provide earthwork cut and fill quantities on the grading page. 3. Per TSM 8-01.5.1. A, multifamily developments with more than six units must provide centralized onsite waste collection service or receive approval for ES for use of individual containers. 4. Spot grades with no change will not allow for drainage flow. Please revise in center of building openings as well as behind buildings. 5. Property located in FEMA Zone X. Floodplain Use permits and elevation certificates will be required for site work and for each building 6. 2-way PAAL width must be at least 24' 7. Nothing may obstruct vehicle operator view in SVT 8. APC's will require ES approval 9. Provide earthwork cut/fill quantities 10. Show Existing and Proposed contours on grading plan 11. First Flush Retention and Balanced Basin Detention requirements must be met 12. All landscaping must be depressed 6-9", not including any DG 13. Show plan for how water will drain from roofs (riprap, etc) 14. Due to extent of grading, please provide a floodplain encroachment analysis in a drainage report showing the Base Flood Elevation will not be raised by more than 2" 15. Update "DP" number on each sheet Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/04/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Bellevue Development ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0276 Address: 4441 E Bellevue Zoning: R-2 Existing Use: vacant, previously graded Proposed Use: Multi-family TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 4, 2022 DUE DATE: November 7, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. The NPPO exception is denied, please inventory existing native plants. 2. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 3. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. The required 6-9” basins do not include d.g. depth. 4. Engineer - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 5. Engineer - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only info missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands. 6. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 7. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 8. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes. 9. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable. 10. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 11. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 12. The street landscape border does not comply with the Code requirements. The shrub and groundcover doesn’t meet the 50% cover requirement. Three trees are required. Recommend updating the plant pallet, especially oleander and lantana. 13. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g. 14. Installing landscape/irrigation in the right of way requires approval from DoT&M, contact david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov, plans cannot be approved without the department’s consent. 15. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 16. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. 17. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 18. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific. 19. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted and approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. Please note that Mesquite hybrids will be considered native trees, and should be included in NPP inventory UDC 7.7.6. 20. Please distinguish between the mitigation/salvage plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees. 21. Please provide a summary of quantities of all inventoried, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans. 22. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 23. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/28/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 4441 E Bellevue – Multi-Family Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0276 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 19, 2022 DUE DATE: October 25, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 03, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the Client listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and total number of sheets is not correct on sheet C.4. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0276, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Section number “40” listed on the Vicinity Map is not correct. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review UDC TABLE 4.8-2 and provide the Use Specific Standards that apply to mulit-family development in the R-2 Zone under Site Note 3. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove Site Note 23 and this site does not boarder on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As it appears that a Design Development Option, Board of Adjustment, PDMR, TSMR maybe required for the project if approved provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide a general note stating the floor area for each building. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Review UDC Article 6.4.3 and provide a correct lot coverage calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Show the sight visibility triangles on the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet C.2 you call out a “21’-8” 2 WAY STREET”. Clarify if this is a street or a PAAL. If this is a PAAL it does not meet the minimum width requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D, Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1 of 24’. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDSR) will need to be approved to reduce the PAAL width. Per UDC Article 7.4.10.D.10 the PDMR may only reduce the PAAL width by 5% or a width of 22.8’. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a fully dimensioned parking area. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.1, .G, .H & .I are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The required number of short-term bicycle parking spaces shown is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.3.G and provide the correct number of required short-term spaces. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The Bicycle Rack Layout detail provided on sheet C.2 does not match the layout shown on the plan. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Review 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and provide a accessible vehicle parking space, required & provided, calculation on the plan. This calculation shall include the number of van accessible, required & provided. Show the accessible space(s) on the plan. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the required accessible parking sign. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – It is not clear how access is provided to the garages and vehicle parking space. Site Plan Keynote 4 calls for “EXTRUDED CURB” the entire length of the proposed street. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.I – On sheet C.2 you call out a “21’-8” 2 WAY STREET”. Clarify is this street will be private or public. I public it will need to be dedicated prior to approval of this DP. This proposed street does not meet any of the street cross sections found in TSM Section 10 and will require a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) approval from COT DTM prior to approval of this DP. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – The proposed “10’-0” UTILITY EASEMENT” shown on sheet C.2 will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. Provide the recordation information on the plan. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The 6’-0” setback shown on sheet C.2 is not correct and should 10’-0” or ¾ (H) = Height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two dimensions, see UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C multi-family is considered nonresidential. Based on the proposed height of 20’-0” provided under Site Note 4 the minimum perimeter yard setback from the proposed buildings to the north, east & west property line is 15’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed structures to the street property line along Bellevue St. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1 the minimum street perimeter yard setback for this site is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, greater of the two. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each building and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required for the sidewalks as shown the plan. 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Show the required sidewalk within the right-of-way along Bellevue St. 31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Demonstrate how mail delivery will be provided for this site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |