Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP22-0276
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 03/10/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | APPROVED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves DP22-0276 Bellevue Townhomes. The applicant has the option of a single address with building/unit numbers or individual addresses as they are currently issued to the plat. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 03/10/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/16/2022 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Requires NPPO submittal | ||
| 01/05/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The site is located in a Zone X FEMA floodplain and each building will require a floodplain use permit unless a watershed study proving the property is unaffected by 100-year floods is provided. 2. Provide earthwork cut and fill quantities on the grading page. 3. Per TSM 8-01.5.1. A, multifamily developments with more than six units must provide centralized onsite waste collection service or receive approval for ES for use of individual containers. 4. Spot grades with no change will not allow for drainage flow. Please revise in center of building openings as well as behind buildings. 5. Property located in FEMA Zone X. Floodplain Use permits and elevation certificates will be required for site work and for each building. 6. 2-way PAAL width must be at least 24'. 7. Nothing may obstruct vehicle operator view in SVT. 8. APC's will require ES approval. 9. Provide earthwork cut/fill quantities. 10. Show Existing and Proposed contours on grading plan. 11. First Flush Retention and Balanced Basin Detention requirements must be met. 12. All landscaping must be depressed 6-9", measured from the top of any ground cover. 13. Show on the plans the how the discharge from the roof will be directed. 14. Due to extent of grading, please provide a floodplain encroachment analysis in a drainage report showing the Base Flood Elevation will not be raised by more than 0.1'. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/16/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Landscape, irrigation and water harvesting plans are required but not submitted. | ||
| 01/02/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 4441 E Bellevue – Multi-Family Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0276 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 2, 2023 DUE DATE: January 13, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. COMMENTS: The plans submitted on this submittal are only for the required DDO. The following comments still apply. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 03, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the Client listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and total number of sheets is not correct on sheet C.4. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0276, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Section number “40” listed on the Vicinity Map is not correct. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review UDC TABLE 4.8-2 and provide the Use Specific Standards that apply to mulit-family development in the R-2 Zone under Site Note 3. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove Site Note 23 and this site does not boarder on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As it appears that a Design Development Option, Board of Adjustment, PDMR, TSMR maybe required for the project if approved provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide a general note stating the floor area for each building. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Review UDC Article 6.4.3 and provide a correct lot coverage calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Show the sight visibility triangles on the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet C.2 you call out a “21’-8” 2 WAY STREET”. Clarify if this is a street or a PAAL. If this is a PAAL it does not meet the minimum width requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D, Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1 of 24’. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDSR) will need to be approved to reduce the PAAL width. Per UDC Article 7.4.10.D.10 the PDMR may only reduce the PAAL width by 5% or a width of 22.8’. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a fully dimensioned parking area. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.1, .G, .H & .I are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The required number of short-term bicycle parking spaces shown is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.3.G and provide the correct number of required short-term spaces. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The Bicycle Rack Layout detail provided on sheet C.2 does not match the layout shown on the plan. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Review 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and provide a accessible vehicle parking space, required & provided, calculation on the plan. This calculation shall include the number of van accessible, required & provided. Show the accessible space(s) on the plan. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the required accessible parking sign. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – It is not clear how access is provided to the garages and vehicle parking space. Site Plan Keynote 4 calls for “EXTRUDED CURB” the entire length of the proposed street. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.I – On sheet C.2 you call out a “21’-8” 2 WAY STREET”. Clarify is this street will be private or public. I public it will need to be dedicated prior to approval of this DP. This proposed street does not meet any of the street cross sections found in TSM Section 10 and will require a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) approval from COT DTM prior to approval of this DP. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – The proposed “10’-0” UTILITY EASEMENT” shown on sheet C.2 will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. Provide the recordation information on the plan. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The 6’-0” setback shown on sheet C.2 is not correct and should 10’-0” or ¾ (H) = Height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two dimensions, see UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C multi-family is considered nonresidential. Based on the proposed height of 20’-0” provided under Site Note 4 the minimum perimeter yard setback from the proposed buildings to the north, east & west property line is 15’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed structures to the street property line along Bellevue St. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1 the minimum street perimeter yard setback for this site is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, greater of the two. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each building and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required for the sidewalks as shown the plan. 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Show the required sidewalk within the right-of-way along Bellevue St. 31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Demonstrate how mail delivery will be provided for this site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 01/10/2023 | Zoning Modifications - DDO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multifamily development is a permitted use in the R-2 zone, subject to use-specific standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, and .10. This site is also located within an established area. Per UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a, the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall, measured from the street property line, whichever is greater. Based on a wall height of 20'-10", the required front street setback is 31'-3"; proposed setback is 13'-0". Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A, when a nonresidential use in the R-2 zone is adjacent to a residential zone, the minimum required interior perimeter yards are 10'-0" or 3/4 the height of the proposed wall, measured from the interior property lines, whichever is greater. Based on a wall height of 19'-8", the required setbacks to the east and west property lines from the building walls are 14'-9"; proposed is approximately 5'-1". Based on a wall height of approximately 7'-3", the required setbacks to the east and west property lines from the posts of the rear porches is 10'-0"; proposed is 1'-6". A DDO application has been submitted for these setback reductions. Zoning Administration staff will complete this review once the DDO process has concluded and a resubmittal of DP22-0276 has been received. Should you have questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. |
||
| 12/19/2022 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |