Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0255
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/08/2022 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | NOT REQUIRED | |||
12/08/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
10/28/2022 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 10/5/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (3441-05, 2978.48'-) is more than 12" below the first floor elevation (2979.50'). Backwater valves are required only when the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole is either above the first floor elevation or less than 12" below the first floor elevation. Revise the note on the utility plan, C5.0, to require the installation of a backwater valve for plumbing fixtures located below 2979.48' when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. | ||
10/28/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 9/30/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1. 2. On the cover sheet include truck access in the label on the SW lane to the back of the building. 3. On page C6.1 detail ramp "A" is showing a cross slope of 7.0% which exceeds the max 2%. Revise as needed. 4. The Detention/Retention and rainwater harvesting look great, thank you. A few small things to consider for consistency and to better ensure proper construction: 1. A few of the grading sheets have a callout #9 that call out - New water harvesting landscape basin, (6" max. ponding depth). This should read 9" instead of 6". 2. On the grading plan the landscaped islands that stick out into the parking on the building side of the parking lot need to be indicated that they are depressed 6"-9" for at least passive rainwater harvesting. 3. On the landscaping/water harvesting sheets it needs to be indicated or made clear that the 6"-9" depressed area in each planting well is taking into account the ground cover. So with 2" ground cover the depression needs to be 8"-11" above the finished grade. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
11/21/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Linzer Products ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0255 Address: 8655 S Distribution Way Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: partially graded Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Commercial, Manufacturing, Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 21, 2022 DUE DATE: October 6, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Engineer & LA comment – Thank you for the well done water harvesting plan. 2. Engineer Comment – Identify size and source of rock used for riprap. Please identify the smaller rock hatch and provide same info. 3. Truck watering salvaged trees results in high mortality, please revise plans to include a temporary irrigation system. 4. Please provide parking landscape calculations on the landscape plan, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 5. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 6. Please distinguish between the 58 mitigation plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information. 7. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
10/28/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 9/28/2022 PAUL CAMARENA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 8655 S DISTRIBUTION WY Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0255 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 28, 2022 DUE DATE: October 06, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 09, 2022. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP22-0255, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - On the location map Distribution Way is oriented incorrectly please revise. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide the use specific standards for each of the proposed uses. Clarify of these uses are going to act independently of each other or if the use Primary use is Commercial storage and the other uses are an accessory use. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - This site is located in ADC-3 and in the NCD-A, Provide a general note that this site will comply with , DM AFB Approach-Departure Corridor -3 and DM AFB Noise Control District. 5. COMMENT: Provide the FAR calculation as a sperate note. ADC- 3 Performance Standards - For uses in the Industrial, Wholesaling and Storage land use groups, the maximum FAR is .40 of the project site area; b. For all other non-residential land use groups, the maximum FAR is .20 of the project site area, Any meeting space and function areas where people gather in excess of 5,000 square feet in area shall be located underground. NCD-A - Performance Standards - The following uses shall be sound attenuated, to reduce the interior noise level by 25 decibels, to 40-45 Ldn , in accordance with the Technical Standards Manual: (1) Site -built residential uses; (2) Places of public accommodation ; and (3) Administrative and Professional Offices. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Within the storage use development the minimum width of a PAAL is 30ft. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Ensure that the vehicle over have will not implied pedestrian circulation. Provide a detail showing a “clearance space of at least four feet in width is provided for pedestrian access 8. COMMENT: Revise the detail on sheet 19 to show a 11ft wide Van spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Clarify if loading zones are proposed if so please adhere to the UDC section 7.5.4., If not loading zones are proposed please provide a general note. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided for each use. Provide a detail for the long term bicycle parking, clarify the location of the remaining long term bicycle parking’s. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - Clarify why there is a Temporary Ingress/easement on the south west portion of the property. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - It is acknowledge the setback are notated on the cover page, It is recommend that the setback are to be placed on sheet 4 as well. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Show pedestrian circulation to the collection areas. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Clarify if a mailbox is going to be proposed, If mail is to be delivered inside provide a note “ Mail service to be located inside the building” 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a note on the cover sheet that “ All proposed sign will be approver per a separate permit” ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |