Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0228
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 03/02/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/02/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview 1. Remove keynotes that are not present in the drawing. 2. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure or a keynote indicating it is compliant with the dimensional standards outlined in TSM 8-01.5.2. 3. Maximize water harvesting to proposed landscape areas through use of curb cuts or flush curbs. 4. Show that water harvesting is being maximized through use of a commercial rainwater harvesting plan. Show proposed drainage patterns. 5. TSM 7-01.4.3 requires minimum 4-foot wide sidewalk with no obstructions. Provide wheel stops for eastern parking spots or widen sidewalk to allow for a 2.5-foot vehicle overhang while maintaining 4-foot unobstructed sidewalk. 6. Indicate mail service location and pedestrian access to mail service. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/27/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 126/132 W Sahuaro St Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0228 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 27, 2023 DUE DATE: March 02, 2023 This comment was not addressed. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 10, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – As the development package is for site related reviews only and it appears that you are proposing only one (1) sheet for DP review remove all other references to the other sheets from the index. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. This comment was not addressed correctly, see comment 1 above. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the email address for the designer/owner listed on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project. Also, provide the email address for the Designer listed on the plan. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – List the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block. 5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0228, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 7. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 8. This comment was not addressed. The use should be listed as Multifamily. Per COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES, C-3 Zone and identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. This comment was not addressed. Clarify what the Gross site area and net site area are as they do not match the lot size listed on the plan. Lot coverage includes all vehicle use areas. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The lot coverage calculation is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.3 and provide a correct lot coverage calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information for Sahuaro St, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The back-up spur shown at the north end of the vehicle parking shall meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. 13. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Based on the definition of a bedroom and the layout shown on the plan you are proposing 4 3-bedroom units on this site. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre, 3-bedroom units require 2.25 space per dwelling. 14. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide an accessible vehicle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provided. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Cleary demonstrate that the proposed accessible vehicle parking space meets all requirements of the ICC A117.1-2009 to include but not limited to, slopes, signage, etc. 16. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces and provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provide. Also, clearly show the location of the required bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9. 17. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a, the required front street perimeter yard setback is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater. Per UDC Article 11.3.7.A.3 Definition of Multifamily this site is multifamily. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C Multifamily development is considered a nonresidential use for determining the applicable dimensional standards. UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A C-3 Zone, Nonres Use to a Nonres Zone the required setback to the north, east and west property line is 0’-0”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setbacks listed under AREA CALCULATIONS/PROPERTY DATA are not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a and UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES and provide the correct setbacks. 18. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 19. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang the proposed sidewalk clearly demonstrate that the minimum 4’-0” sidewalk width is maintained when the vehicle overhangs the sidewalk, TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Cleary demonstrate that the proposed accessible access aisle and required pedestrian way meets the requirements of the ICC A117.1-2009 to include but not limited to, slopes, etc. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and detailed comment response letter. |
||
| 01/27/2023 | Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED |