Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP22-0219
Parcel: 10309057A

Address:
3801 N RUNWAY DR

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1

Permit Number - DP22-0219
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/01/2022 NPPO NOT REQUIRED
11/14/2022 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
11/01/2022 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
b. The points of connection to the existing public sewer.
c. Any existing or proposed utility easements
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
11/14/2022 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT TFD requires that gates across an apparatus access road if powered shall have a KNOX Gate key switch and KNOX Box located at the gate. This note shall be added to your drawings.
Buildings exceeding 30’ shall be provided with aerial access meeting IFC 2018, Appendix D, Section D105. D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15’ and not greater than 30’ from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which aerial apparatus access road positioned shall be approved by the fire code official.
F.D.C. shall face the street side of the building, IFC 2018, Chapter 9, Section 912, 912.2.1 and shall not be obstructed by a gate
Questions:
Jennifer Peel-Davis
Tucson Fire Department
Fire Plans Examiner
Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
Desk: 520-837-7033
10/31/2022 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for all firms/organizations that prepared documents for this development package including the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1.
2. Provide waste stream calculations for new and existing buildings.
3. Show any new and existing trash enclosures for the site and show that they comply with TSM section 8-01.
4. Show drainage discharge points off the roof.
5. Clarify by note or detail on both the grading sheet and landscaping sheets that the depressed landscaped areas are depressed 6-9 inches measured from the top of the ground cover.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
11/01/2022 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: U-Haul
ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0219
Address: 3801 N Runway Dr
Zoning: I-1
Existing Use: Warehouse
Proposed Use: Warehouse

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2022
DUE DATE: October 17, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
Comments 1 – 8 are the responsibility of the Civil.
1. The drainage solution does not maximize water harvesting. First flow should be directed to landscape areas. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening.
2. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes.
3. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf
COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf
4. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands.
5. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation.
a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible.
b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas.
c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas.
d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained.
e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations.
f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements.
6. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match.
7. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.
8. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes.
9. The basin floor requires hydroseed or rock larger than 4”.
10. Please review 7.6.2 for applicability. Without expansion calculations on the plan, the assumption was made that the expansion is greater than 25% and therefore the entire site must be brought up to Code. Specifically, that means that the entire length of Runway Drive requires a 10’ street border.
11. Please revise landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g.
12. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
10/31/2022 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: U-Haul Warehours
Development Package (1st Review)
DP22-0219

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2022

DUE DATE: October 17, 2022

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 27, 2023.

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove the “PRELIMARY FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY” from the professional stamp.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email addresses, and phone number for the property owner of the site.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0219, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Clarify what the proposed use is. General Note 4 calls out Commercial Storage but listed within the footprint of the proposed building you list Personal Storage.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – The “10’ COMM. ESMT” called out to be abandoned will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly show how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met on the plan.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comments 5 is addressed Zoning cannot verify vehicle parking requirements.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – It does not appear that the loading space calculation is correct. Clearly show how direct access is provide to the storage building.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comments 5 is addressed Zoning cannot verify bicycle parking requirements.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – The “NEW PUBLIC EASEMENT” will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. Once recorded provide the recordation information on the plan.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks shown are not correct. Street perimeter yard setbacks for this site are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B are met. Zoning acknowledges that TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B.2 may apply, clearly show the required pedestrian refuge areas on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package