Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP22-0173
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 10/16/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/13/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The provided pages of the plan set were not adequate to review for corrections. Please provide a full civil and site set. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/12/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Villegas Storage Development Package (3rd Review) DP22-0173 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 12, 2023 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 26, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS Zoning was not able to review the DP as a complete plan set was not provided, It appears the a Variance is being applied for zoning cannot approve the DP until the Variance is approved. If the Variance is approved provide a general note on the plan stating what was modified and if applicable list any conditions of approval. These comment may still be applicable. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0173, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners on the location map 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standard listed under General Note 3 is not correct and should be 4.9.10.A. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Oracle Rd is designated as an ARTERIAL GATEWAY on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)” 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Oracle, Flores & 13th dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels east of Oracle, west of 13th and south of Flores. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of accessible spaces required and provided to include van accessible. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per the 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 the accessible parking space is required to be van accessible meeting the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the applicable mounting height for the proposed accessible sign on the detail. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Provide a loading space calculation on the plan that includes the number required and provided along with the type required. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly show the required long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Depending on how comment 5 is addressed and ff Oracle Rd is not at future width, based on the COT MS&R Map the following may apply; shown the future right-of-way line, curb and sidewalk for Oracle on the plan. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – It does not appear that street perimeter yard setbacks are shown correctly. Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1: Oracle Rd setback should be 21’ or the H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two as measured from the back of curb or futured curb, Flores & 13 should be 1’ or the H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two as measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A are met on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Detail 3 sheet 2 shows the proposed HC Sign located within the sidewalk, clearly demonstrated that the minimum sidewalk width is maintained, see TSM 7-01.4.3.A. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Paul Camarena at Paul.camarena@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 10/11/2023 | Zoning Modifications - Variance | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The variance application has been received. Staff will notify you of your scheduled Design Review Board meeting date, public hearing date, and next steps moving forward. If you have questions, contact Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov |