Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP22-0139
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/06/2022 | Fire New Construction | APPROVED | |||
| 12/02/2022 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 12/02/2022 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 12/06/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/09/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 8200 E BOWLINE RD Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0139 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/09/2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 20, 2022 . SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS This comment is still applicable. Please correct the section corners. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Please provide the section corners as noted by the standard above. This comment is still applicable the zoning acknowledges there is no building, but the minimum long term bicycle parking requirement is 2 spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long-term bicycle spaces required and provided. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Revise the bicycle parking calculation for commercial storage long term bicycle parking required is “1 space per 40,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. The maximum requirement is 10 spaces.” If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package CDRC TRANSMITTAL |