Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP22-0136
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2022 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 12/28/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/08/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. See previous engineering comment 1 for underground retention approval for this project and show on the plans/drainage report that the following are demonstrated per Retention/Detention Manual section 4.13.1: a. Compliance with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance with Landscaping’s approval. b. It is clearly demonstrated in the drainage report that the increased storage volume (1.5 times the required 100-year detention volume) is provided. c. Infiltration rates of the soil beneath the underground storage chambers are such that the system will experience reasonable drain down times of the retained volume. This can be presented in the form of a geotechnical report with this development package approval or in the form of percolation tests submitted before final inspection. d. Full access for inspection, maintenance, and sediment removal for each chamber of the underground storage system along with a note in the plan set and/or drainage report requiring that the manufacturer’s inspection & maintenance schedule be followed. e. Per section 4.13.1.7 of the Retention/Detention Manual include the required CCRs for the project to be recorded which includes the inspection and maintenance responsibilities. a sample can be found at: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-appendix-g.pdf f. Apply for the city engineering approval requesting permission to use underground retention via email to Loren (loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov) and myself (Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov) with documentation demonstrating compliance with the above comments. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/16/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Farmington Expo ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0136 v2 Address: 1114 S Farmington Rd Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: previously unpermitted graded land Proposed Use: Swap meet, auction TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 16, 2022 DUE DATE: December 15, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Relate the first flow retention to the plant water demand, the numbers on the Water Budget Table and the Drainage report are contradictory. WHIA – 1 needs to be scaled back to the areas that are actually collecting water and being delivered to plants. 2. Engineer - The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of maximizing water harvesting, as most of the first flush is being directed into underground storage. 3. Mitigation calculations are incorrect, they are 2:1 replacement for plants destroyed. UDC 10.4.5.B. and 7.7.5. 4. Move hydroseed list to landscape plan and indicate where installed. 5. This comment was not addressed - Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Tucson Development Center https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/28/2022 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments |