Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP22-0025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/24/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Waste stream calculations and refuse enclosure details are required per TSM Section 8. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/16/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 935 W Grant – Site Fence Development Package (3rd Review) DP22-0025 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 16, 2024 DUE DATE: July 21, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 17, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.2.4 – A development package is used for review of site items. COMMENT: On Sheet 1 remove all references to building code. i.e. Occupancy group, etc. 2-06.4.0 Content Requirements: 2. This comment was not addressed. Add the email address for both the owner & Contractor listed on sheet 1. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. COMMENT: Add the required information for the property owner and developer as described above. 3. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. COMMENT: On Sheet 1 under “OCCUPANCY GROUP” you list “M(MERCHANTILE)”, See Comment 1. On Sheet 1 under “LAND USE” you list “COMMUNICATION-WIRELESS”. Clarify what the existing and proposed use is and provide any applicable Use Specific Standards as a general note. Under General Note 4, “Land Use Notes” & “Zoning Notes” provide the correct Land Use and reference to the correct section of the UDC. 4. This comment was not addressed. As Grant Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R). 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. COMMENT: On Sheet 1, General Note 6, change reference from Park and 18th to correct MS&R streets. 5. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide the percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage. COMMENT: Remove the reference to “LOT COVERAGE CALULATION” as lot coverage is not applicable to this project, see UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-I, I-2, & I-2 ZONES. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. As the proposed fence around the dumpster area is located within the 24’ Private ingress/egress easement the easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. COMMENT: Per Final Plat Grant Interstate Commons, recorded in Book 46, Page 27 there is an existing 24’ PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS ESMT that runs along the south side of this site. Show this easement on the plan and demonstrate that the proposed fence does not encroach into this easement. A portion of this easement may need to be to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 7. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. COMMENT: On Sheet 2 add dimension for sidewalks, curb cuts, curbs along Grant Road. 8. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. COMMENT: As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 115-16-040C 115-16-0410 & 115-16-0420, a lot combination is required. Either provide the approved Combo Request form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. Contact the Pima County for the Combo Request and/or the covenant can: be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Covenant_Regarding_Development_and_Use_of_Real_Property_UDC.pdf. 9. This comment was not fully addressed. The vehicle parking space calculation shall provide the number required & provided and will also include the number of required and provided accessible parking spaces to in include van accessible spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that provides the correct use, ratio used, number required & provide. Until the use is clarified, see Comment 8 is addressed Zoning cannot verify vehicle parking requirements. 10. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). COMMENT: On site plan add the above information inside building footprint. 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Sheet 1 note 4 you list “DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS PER UDC TABLE 4.8.5”, Table 4.8.5 is permitted uses not dimensional standards. Revise note to reference the correct table or remove the reference. 12. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Under “SCOPE OF WORK” you list “75 LINEAR FT OF 7’ TALL EXPOSED TOP CORRUGATED METAL FENCE” but the “DETAIL FOR FENCE” on Sheets 1 and 2 shows “3’”, clarify which is correct. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 06/20/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |