Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/24/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The following comments were not addressed: 1. Show the location of the solid waste dumpsters within the enclosures. 2. Show access and service location for the service vehicles. The gates and approaches must meet the requirements of Tech Standard 8-01. For any divergence from the code, please provide approval from ES: andy vera at andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov approval in the form of an email is accepted. Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/21/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nathan Herrera Planner PROJECT: Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0025 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 21, 2023 DUE DATE: April 28, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is , 2019. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.2.4 – A development package is used for review of site items. COMMENT: On Sheet 1 remove all references to building code. i.e. Occupancy group, etc. 2-06.3.0 Format Requirements: 2. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. COMMENT: Remove aerial from location map 3. 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. COMMENT: Legend on Sheet 2 is missing symbol for sidewalk as shown on site plan, “Pavement Road” and “Paved Parking Lot” symbols are not used on site plan. Remove those symbols from Legend if they will not be used on site plan. 4. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. COMMENT: Sheet Index on Pg1 is missing reference to an included sheet of the package. Sheet Index is not uniform on all sheets. 2-06.4.0 Content Requirements: 5. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. COMMENT: Add the required information for the property owner and developer as described above. 6. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. COMMENT: Add legal description to Title Block in lower right corner on all sheets. 7. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners shall be shown on the project location map. COMMENT: Add the above to the project location map. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. COMMENT: On Sheet 1 under “OCCUPANCY GROUP” you list “M(MERCHANTILE)”, See Comment 1. On Sheet 1 under “LAND USE” you list “COMMUNICATION-WIRELESS”. Clarify what the existing and proposed use is and provide any applicable Use Specific Standards as a general note. Under General Note 4, “Land Use Notes” & “Zoning Notes” provide the correct Land Use and reference to the correct section of the UDC. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. COMMENT: On Sheet 1, General Note 6, change reference from Park and 18th to correct MS&R streets. 10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide the percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage. COMMENT: Remove the reference to “LOT COVERAGE CALULATION” as lot coverage is not applicable to this project, see UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-I, I-2, & I-2 ZONES. 11. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. COMMENT: Per Final Plat Grant Interstate Commons, recorded in Book 46, Page 27 there is an existing 24’ PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS ESMT that runs along the south side of this site. Show this easement on the plan and demonstrate that the proposed fence does not encroach into this easement. A portion of this easement may need to be to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 12. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. COMMENT: On Sheet 2 add dimension for sidewalks, curb cuts, curbs along Grant Road. 13. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. COMMENT: As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 115-16-040C 115-16-0410 & 115-16-0420, a lot combination is required. Either provide the approved Combo Request form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. Contact the Pima County for the Combo Request and/or the covenant can: be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Covenant_Regarding_Development_and_Use_of_Real_Property_UDC.pdf 14. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. COMMENT: Identify zoning to the west and add to cover sheet under General Notes. Add zoning for adjacent properties to Sheet 2 site plan 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide an access lane width dimension from the proposed fence north to the landscape island. Minimum width for the access land is 20’-0”, UDC Table 7.4.6-2 and also demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met. COMMENT: Provide an access lane width dimension from the proposed fence north to the landscape island. Minimum width for the access land is 20’-0”, UDC Table 7.4.6-2 and also demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that provides the correct use, ratio used, number required & provide. Until the use is clarified, see Comment 8 is addressed Zoning cannot verify vehicle parking requirements. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long-term bicycle spaces required. Identify long term bicycle parking on site plan. 18. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). COMMENT: On site plan add the above information inside building footprint. 19. COMMENT: Sheet 1 note 4 you list “DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS PER UDC TABLE 4.8.5”, Table 4.8.5 is permitted uses not dimensional standards. Revise note to reference the correct table or remove the reference. 20. COMMENT: Under “SCOPE OF WORK” you list “75 LINEAR FT OF 7’ TALL EXPOSED TOP CORRUGATED METAL FENCE” but the “DETAIL FOR FENCE” on Sheets 1 and 2 shows “3’”, clarify which is correct. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised Development Package along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Nathan.Herrera@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/23/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |