Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP21-0241
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/18/2022 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | |||
| 12/09/2022 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 11/29/2022 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 01/31/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/31/2023 | Entitlements | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | In the right hand margin of sheets 3 through 7 revise the rezoning case number to read correctly as C9-07-10 rather than C9-01-10. In addition, place the DP case # (DP-21-0241) in the blank space just below the rezoning case number in the upper left hand corner of sheet 2 of 7. | ||
| 11/16/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Commercial Plaza – 1601 N Alvernon Way Development Package (3rd Review) DP21-0241 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 16, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 06, 2022. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes Please clarify the use, there are two uses listed on general note 3, If the use is Administrative and Professional Office please revise the use to state “ Proposed use Administrative and Professional Office subject to use specific standard:4.9.13.J” but if the use is medical office revise the note to state “Medical Service: Outpatient (excluding blood donor centers) subject to use specific standard 4.9.4.O.1, 4.9.4.P.1, and 4.9.13.J” If the use is Medical service outpatient please revise the parking calculation to reflect the correct use. 1. This comment was not addressed. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-3: PERMITTED USES – OFFICE ZONES, O-2 Zone, Administrative and Professional Office use is subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.J. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Once comment 11 is addressed identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Clearly show the right of way dimension for both LEE street and Alvernon Way. Zoning acknowledges that there is a detail for Alvernon way but it is unclear if the building is going be meeting the MS&R setback. 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. The street perimeter yard setback for Alvernon Way is 21’ or the (H) height of the building exterior wall, not 1 ½ the height. Also, the street perimeter yard setback for Lee is 21’ or the (H) height of the building exterior wall measured from outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane, not 10’-0”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks shown under “SITE DATA: “ are not correct. Per UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback when a property boarder on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map it does not qualify for Established Area Setbacks. That said per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. For Alvernon Way this setback is measured form the back of future curb and for Lee it measured from outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. This comment is still applicable. After reviewing the elevation, the wall height is 15ft, which would require a setback of 11ft 3in 3. Zoning acknowledges your response to this comment but was unable to find the 14’- 6” height shown anywhere on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Table 6.3-3.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE O-1, O-2, & O-3 ZONES, O-2 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 10’-0” or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. Based on a 15’-0” high building the required perimeter yard setback to the west property line is 11’-3”, proposed setback is 11’-0”. To reduce this setback a Design Development Option is required to be submitted and approved. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |