Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP21-0231
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/28/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/29/2021 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 11/29/2021 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show with dimensions the required 10 wide parking space on all parking spaces that abut a vertical barrier over 6 inches tall as per UDC article 7.4.6.D.2.b. 2. Show how all parking spaces around the east end of the PAAL comply with UDC article 7.4.6.F.4 - Back-Up Spur. 3. It is unclear from the site plan if the existing handicap ramp on the west end of the Wanslee Auto Bldg is to remain and how a handicap person is going to be able to access the building from the handicap parking. Clarify and revise as needed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/23/2021 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 09/23/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 725 S 6th Ave – Parking Lot Modification Development Package (1st Review) HC-3 DP21-0231 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2021 DUE DATE: October 05, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 01, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0231, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Permitting General Note 2 you state “ARMORY PARK DOWNTOWN INCENTIVE ZONE (IID) PROJECT” are you going to go through IID review? Based on the plan provided there are no modifications to development standards that would require approval through the IID. Also, this IID is within the Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict not sure where you are finding Armory Park Downtown Incentive Zone. If you elect to go through IID review provide the case number adjacent to the title block and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As you are proposing to demolish a structure on site and the zoning is HC-3 Historic Review will be required. Contact Jodie Brown for requirements at Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov. Provide the historic case number adjacent to the title block and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, as automotive service and repair is not specifically listed in the table the requirement is the standard formula, UDC Article 7.4.3.A.2, listed for the COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, 1 space for 300 sq. ft. of GFA. Also, it does not appear that the shed square footage is included in the calculation and as the requirement is based on GFA is should be included. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimun width requirements when adjacent to a barrier. A motor vehicle parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. The following vehicle parking spaces are required to be 10’0” wide: Western most accessible space adjacent to the site wall Standard space located adjacent to the west end of the building Standard space located adjacent to the east end of the building Standard space located adjacent to the west end of the shed Standard space located adjacent to the south end of the shed 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of all structures within the footprint of the building(s). 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Based on current aerial photos it appears that you are removing an accessible ramp from the west end of the building. Demonstrate how a handicapped individual will be able to access the building from the accessible parking spaces without going behind the parking spaces, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |